One componet of my seminary training has been to take the Gallup Organziation's StrengthsFinder Test. I have actually had the chance to take it twice, and get two readings, one by Greg Meland, and one by Brian Schubring, both of whom are staff members of Bethel Seminary. This test is simply amzaing in it's ability to get to the core of who you are. Below are the results of my test(s) with the detailed info of what it means to be those themes for my first testing. The order is of limited importance (though it does matter) but it should be stated that I work out of my Significance and Command (even though Command doesn't show on my second test, it was #6). You can also find out more on this in Marcus Buckingham's Now, Discover Your Strengths. You can also learn about this in Donald Clifton's book Soar with Your Strength. Clifton wrote the Strengths Quest book I have worked with also.
Activator
"When can we start?" This is a recurring question in your life. You are impatient for action. You may concede that analysis has its uses or that debate and discussion can occasionally yield some valuable insights, but deep down you know that only action is real. Only action can make things happen. Only action leads to performance. Once a decision is made, you cannot not act. Others may worry that "there are still some things we don't know," but this doesn't seem to slow you. If the decision has been made to go across town, you know that the fastest way to get there is to go stoplight to stoplight. You are not going to sit around waiting until all the lights have turned green. Besides, in your view, action and thinking are not opposites. In fact, guided by your Activator theme, you believe that action is the best device for learning. You make a decision, you take action, you look at the result, and you learn. This learning informs your next action and your next. How can you grow if you have nothing to react to? Well, you believe you can't. You must put yourself out there. You must take the next step. It is the only way to keep your thinking fresh and informed. The bottom line is this: You know you will be judged not by what you say, not by what you think, but by what you get done. This does not frighten you. It pleases you.
Learner
You love to learn. The subject matter that interests you most will be determined by your other themes and experiences, but whatever the subject, you will always be drawn to the process of learning. The process, more than the content or the result, is especially exciting for you. You are energized by the steady and deliberate journey from ignorance to competence. The thrill of the first few facts, the early efforts to recite or practice what you have learned, the growing confidence of a skill mastered-this is the process that entices you. Your excitement leads you to engage in adult learning experiences-yoga or piano lessons or graduate classes. It enables you to thrive in dynamic work environments where you are asked to take on short project assignments and are expected to learn a lot about the new subject matter in a short period of time and then move on to the next one. This Learner theme does not necessarily mean that you seek to become the subject matter expert, or that you are striving for the respect that accompanies a professional or academic credential. The outcome of the learning is less significant than the "getting there."
Context
You look back. You look back because that is where the answers lie. You look back to understand the present. From your vantage point the present is unstable, a confusing clamor of competing voices. It is only by casting your mind back to an earlier time, a time when the plans were being drawn up, that the present regains its stability. The earlier time was a simpler time. It was a time of blueprints. As you look back, you begin to see these blueprints emerge. You realize what the initial intentions were. These blueprints or intentions have since become so embellished that they are almost unrecognizable, but now this Context theme reveals them again. This understanding brings you confidence. No longer disoriented, you make better decisions because you sense the underlying structure. You become a better partner because you understand how your colleagues came to be who they are. And counterintuitively you become wiser about the future because you saw its seeds being sown in the past. Faced with new people and new situations, it will take you a little time to orient yourself, but you must give yourself this time. You must discipline yourself to ask the questions and allow the blueprints to emerge because no matter what the situation, if you haven't seen the blueprints, you will have less confidence in your decisions.
Command
Command leads you to take charge. Unlike some people, you feel no discomfort with imposing your views on others. On the contrary, once your opinion is formed, you need to share it with others. Once your goal is set, you feel restless until you have aligned others with you. You are not frightened by confrontation; rather, you know that confrontation is the first step toward resolution. Whereas others may avoid facing up to life's unpleasantness, you feel compelled to present the facts or the truth, no matter how unpleasant it may be. You need things to be clear between people and challenge them to be clear-eyed and honest. You push them to take risks. You may even intimidate them. And while some may resent this, labeling you opinionated, they often willingly hand you the reins. People are drawn toward those who take a stance and ask them to move in a certain direction. Therefore, people will be drawn to you. You have presence. You have Command.
Significance
You want to be very significant in the eyes of other people. In the truest sense of the word you want to be recognized. You want to be heard. You want to stand out. You want to be known. In particular, you want to be known and appreciated for the unique strengths you bring. You feel a need to be admired as credible, professional, and successful. Likewise, you want to associate with others who are credible, professional, and successful. And if they aren't, you will push them to achieve until they are. Or you will move on. An independent spirit, you want your work to be a way of life rather than a job, and in that work you want to be given free rein, the leeway to do things your way. Your yearnings feel intense to you, and you honor those yearnings. And so your life is filled with goals, achievements, or qualifications that you crave. Whatever your focus-and each person is distinct-your Significance theme will keep pulling you upward, away from the mediocre toward the exceptional. It is the theme that keeps you reaching.
The other time (second time) I took the StrengthsFinder test my results changed only a little bit. I took it roughly 6 months later. My Signature Themes then were: 1. Activator 2. Learner 3. Achiever 4. Context 5. Significance
Achiever was #6 on my first test (above) so it wasn't a surprize to have that show up on the second testing.
Achiever
Your Achiever theme helps explain your drive. Achiever describes a constant need for achievement. You feel as if every day starts at zero. By the end of the day you must achieve something tangible in order to feel good about yourself. And by "every day" you mean every single day--workdays, weekends, vacations. No matter how much you may feel you deserve a day of rest, if the day passes without some form of achievement, no matter how small, you will feel dissatisfied. You have an internal fire burning inside you. It pushes you to do more, to achieve more. After each accomplishment is reached, the fire dwindles for a moment, but very soon it rekindles itself, forcing you toward the next accomplishment. Your relentless need for achievement might not be logical. It might not even be focused. But it will always be with you. As an Achiever you must learn to live with this whisper of discontent. It does have its benefits. It brings you the energy you need to work long hours without burning out. It is the jolt you can always count on to get you started on new tasks, new challenges. It is the power supply that causes you to set the pace and define the levels of productivity for your work group. It is the theme that keeps you moving.
Friday, June 24, 2005
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
Biblical Inerrancy: a short review
Chicago Statment on Biblical Inerrancy
A SHORT STATEMENT
1. God, who is Himself Truth and speaks truth only, has inspired Holy Scripture in order thereby to reveal Himself to lost mankind through Jesus Christ as Creator and Lord, Redeemer and Judge. Holy Scripture is God's witness to Himself.
2. Holy Scripture, being God's own Word, written by men prepared and superintended by His Spirit, is of infallible divine authority in all matters upon which it touches: it is to be believed, as God's instruction, in all that it affirms, obeyed, as God's command, in all that it requires; embraced, as God's pledge, in all that it promises.
3. The Holy Spirit, Scripture's divine Author, both authenticates it to us by His inward witness and opens our minds to understand its meaning.
4. Being wholly and verbally God-given, Scripture is without error or fault in all its teaching, no less in what it states about God's acts in creation, about the events of world history, and about its own literary origins under God, than in its witness to God's saving grace in individual lives.
5. The authority of Scripture is inescapably impaired if this total divine inerrancy is in any way limited or disregarded, or made relative to a view of truth contrary to the Bible's own; and such lapses bring serious loss to both the individual and the Church.
A SHORT STATEMENT
1. God, who is Himself Truth and speaks truth only, has inspired Holy Scripture in order thereby to reveal Himself to lost mankind through Jesus Christ as Creator and Lord, Redeemer and Judge. Holy Scripture is God's witness to Himself.
2. Holy Scripture, being God's own Word, written by men prepared and superintended by His Spirit, is of infallible divine authority in all matters upon which it touches: it is to be believed, as God's instruction, in all that it affirms, obeyed, as God's command, in all that it requires; embraced, as God's pledge, in all that it promises.
3. The Holy Spirit, Scripture's divine Author, both authenticates it to us by His inward witness and opens our minds to understand its meaning.
4. Being wholly and verbally God-given, Scripture is without error or fault in all its teaching, no less in what it states about God's acts in creation, about the events of world history, and about its own literary origins under God, than in its witness to God's saving grace in individual lives.
5. The authority of Scripture is inescapably impaired if this total divine inerrancy is in any way limited or disregarded, or made relative to a view of truth contrary to the Bible's own; and such lapses bring serious loss to both the individual and the Church.
Tuesday, June 21, 2005
Am I a Firestarter?!?
No, this isn't a post about Phil Johnson's great blog.
Instead it's a comment on a fire I might have inadvertently started at my church today. Of course, not a literal fire (though combining church and fire might be a way to get more men to go to church...).
After our church staff meeting, we all went out for lunch at Chipotle. While standing in line waiting to order, John Piper's name came up. I know our Sr. Pastor reads Piper, but doesn't always agree with him, and he restated those feelings. Our new Youth Pastor said much the same, and commentented on how he would ditch chapel whenever Piper would speak. This too a turn when our part time children's ministry staff person (she's not a "Pastor", and corrects you if you call her such) commented on how Bethlehem Baptist Church is looking for a Children's Minister for thier North Campus. She referred to how the requirements specifically refer to "he" over and over again in reference to the future Pastor for this position. She started asking me about Piper's views and women pastoring, and I gave her a brief overview of complementarinaism (see HERE for more info). I know she doesn't share Dr. Piper's thinking (mine too) in this area, but it wasn't the appropriate time and place for that deep of a discussion. So rather than go the next step, I told her I had some materials back at the church that would help her understand complimentarinaism if she was interested. I gave her a copy of an article written by Dr. Wayne Grudem in a recent copy of The Journal for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (JBMW: Spring 04) titled: Is Evangelical Feminism the New Path to Liberalism? Some Disturbing Warning Signs. I asked her to read it with an open mind and heart, and to see how God might speak to her through it before I handed her my copy. I also warned her that it might challenge her thinking, and welcomed her to dialog with me if/when she has questions about it.
I had originally planned on giving this copy to our Sr. Pastor. He has recently moved toward egalitarianism, though not fully embraced it from what I have seen. I think in large part as a result of his neice (I think?) graduating from Seminary and having begun a ministry.
So we'll see where this takes us. I hope it opens a genuine dialog among our staff. I pray for God's wisdom and the right words to say with grace when we do talk about it. I believe scripture supports complimentarianism. So maybe I started a fire today...
Instead it's a comment on a fire I might have inadvertently started at my church today. Of course, not a literal fire (though combining church and fire might be a way to get more men to go to church...).
After our church staff meeting, we all went out for lunch at Chipotle. While standing in line waiting to order, John Piper's name came up. I know our Sr. Pastor reads Piper, but doesn't always agree with him, and he restated those feelings. Our new Youth Pastor said much the same, and commentented on how he would ditch chapel whenever Piper would speak. This too a turn when our part time children's ministry staff person (she's not a "Pastor", and corrects you if you call her such) commented on how Bethlehem Baptist Church is looking for a Children's Minister for thier North Campus. She referred to how the requirements specifically refer to "he" over and over again in reference to the future Pastor for this position. She started asking me about Piper's views and women pastoring, and I gave her a brief overview of complementarinaism (see HERE for more info). I know she doesn't share Dr. Piper's thinking (mine too) in this area, but it wasn't the appropriate time and place for that deep of a discussion. So rather than go the next step, I told her I had some materials back at the church that would help her understand complimentarinaism if she was interested. I gave her a copy of an article written by Dr. Wayne Grudem in a recent copy of The Journal for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (JBMW: Spring 04) titled: Is Evangelical Feminism the New Path to Liberalism? Some Disturbing Warning Signs. I asked her to read it with an open mind and heart, and to see how God might speak to her through it before I handed her my copy. I also warned her that it might challenge her thinking, and welcomed her to dialog with me if/when she has questions about it.
I had originally planned on giving this copy to our Sr. Pastor. He has recently moved toward egalitarianism, though not fully embraced it from what I have seen. I think in large part as a result of his neice (I think?) graduating from Seminary and having begun a ministry.
So we'll see where this takes us. I hope it opens a genuine dialog among our staff. I pray for God's wisdom and the right words to say with grace when we do talk about it. I believe scripture supports complimentarianism. So maybe I started a fire today...
Biology and homosexuality
Albert Mohler's personal blog
Today on his personal blog, Dr. Mohler comments on some recent news relating to biology and homosexuality. As he usually does, Dr. Mohler distills this to a simple yet clear Biblical view. Check it out. Sin corrupts all.
If you don't know where you stand, or what to do, start in prayer. Pray for God's wisdom and guidance, both for you, and for those lured into this lifestyle.
Today on his personal blog, Dr. Mohler comments on some recent news relating to biology and homosexuality. As he usually does, Dr. Mohler distills this to a simple yet clear Biblical view. Check it out. Sin corrupts all.
If you don't know where you stand, or what to do, start in prayer. Pray for God's wisdom and guidance, both for you, and for those lured into this lifestyle.
The most important hour in a pastor's week...
(I posted this a week ago, and wanted to see if it could generate a bit more discussion, so I'm moving it to the top of my blog again.)
For those who read this blog, I'd like you to give me your input on this subject. Let me set a few parameters for this though - Prayer, reading the Bible, and all things related to personal development of the pastor are not what I am talking about. I am talking about his function as a pastor, sheparding the flock. What is most important? I suspect there are a variety of opinions on this subject, and that there are possibly more than one "right" answer depending on the context and season of the particular church.
My thoughts currently are split between the half hour before and after church, and the weekly staff meeting. The time before and after church is where a lot of connections are made in most churches. This is probably more true in smaller churches though I suppose.
The staff meeting is where the pastor can put his vision into action through the staff of the church. While a pastor in a small church can keep his hands on each ministry, in larger churches that is simply not possible.
I'd like to spend more time fleshing these thoughts out, but I would first like some feedback (if anyone is reading and feels inclined to do so that is...) on what others think.
For those who read this blog, I'd like you to give me your input on this subject. Let me set a few parameters for this though - Prayer, reading the Bible, and all things related to personal development of the pastor are not what I am talking about. I am talking about his function as a pastor, sheparding the flock. What is most important? I suspect there are a variety of opinions on this subject, and that there are possibly more than one "right" answer depending on the context and season of the particular church.
My thoughts currently are split between the half hour before and after church, and the weekly staff meeting. The time before and after church is where a lot of connections are made in most churches. This is probably more true in smaller churches though I suppose.
The staff meeting is where the pastor can put his vision into action through the staff of the church. While a pastor in a small church can keep his hands on each ministry, in larger churches that is simply not possible.
I'd like to spend more time fleshing these thoughts out, but I would first like some feedback (if anyone is reading and feels inclined to do so that is...) on what others think.
Sunday, June 19, 2005
President Bush's Tax Cuts...
Today Justin Taylor at Between Two Worlds blog has a great post on the economic impact of President Bush's tax cuts over the past few years. Check it out and see if you agree.
Digital camera shopping fun
I have been shopping for a digital camera for the past few weeks for my fiancee and I. It's been a lot of fun learning about the different options and trying to prioritize features to select the best camera for our needs, and one that fits our pocketbooks. We are taking a trip to Seattle over the 4th of July weekend and following week for a wedding for a college pal of Banana (my fiancee). We do both own APS 35mm cameras for when we want to use film.
My parameters for this search have been:
1) 4-6 Megapixels, no less than 4, 5-6 is preferred
2) 8x Optical Zoom. Optical Zoom is where it's at. Digital Zoom is a waste of money.
3) Photo Quality. After all, if the photos don't look good, what was the point?
4) Video Recording. This was one of Banana's requests. She uses this function on the Canon A95 she uses at school and wants this functionality. I could live without it, but I have no problems having it either.
5) Cost. If it doesn't fit the price range, it doesn't matter how good of a camera it is.
I have come up with a couple of good cameras. Two of them are pushing the amount we would like to spend. I had hoped to stay under $500 overall (including memory, bag, and batteries), and two of the ones I really like retail for $499 for only the camera.
My first choice is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ20. This is at the top of the class for optics/photo quality. The body of the camera is small and light, but still sturdy. The drawback, only drawback I have found, is the video recording. It only records at 320X240, and apparently doesn't record sound with the video. But wow does it take nice pictures, and I really like the lithium ion rechargable battery system.
My second choice is the Canon Powershot S2. This is a new to market camera, so that concerns me a bit, as there are not as many reviews, but I've had great luck with the Canon digita camera line. The Powershot S2 seems to be a very small step down in optics/photo quality, but picks up the video options Banana wants. This is likely the camera I would buy if I was at the store today (actually I was earlier), but the problem is nobody has them. Only display models. Canon apparently hasn't shipped them yet to most places. We NEED our camera before July 1st when we head to Seattle. They quoted me a few weeks at the store I looked at this afternoon. I was offered the floor model, but I've never thought owning a floor model was a good idea, especially for electronics. Who know how many times it's been dropped, had goo spilt on it, been licked by a rouge child and so on.
My third choice is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5. This is the brother to the FZ20 listed above, with a few less user options, and a little less cost. If I'm not mistaken, the FZ20 is last year's model, and FZ5 is a 2005 model. FZ5 has the same pros and cons of the FZ20.
My fourth choice is one that probably best fits our price range, and that is the Olympus Camedia C-765. The price is right coming in at as low as $225. It is the only 4 megapixel camera in this bunch. It takes great pictures and has very nice optics. It is also the smallest camera of this bunch, so it'll fit into a purse, where the Canon above is pretty big. The Camedia also is very light, almost to the point I am concerned about durability. While I don't expect a camera to be childproof, I do want something that will last for years.
Others that are on the outside, but are still being considered are the Konica Minolta DiMAGE Z5 and the Kodak EasyShare DX7590. Mr. Bill, Banana's father, has an older model of the DX7590, and it takes pretty nice pictures. They used it when they went to the Presidential Inaugaration earlier this year, and those photos turned out great.
I love buying electronics. Perhaps it's because I'm a man. Perhaps it's because I love having new toys to play with. No matter which camera we go with, I'm going to have a lot of fun with it!
My parameters for this search have been:
1) 4-6 Megapixels, no less than 4, 5-6 is preferred
2) 8x Optical Zoom. Optical Zoom is where it's at. Digital Zoom is a waste of money.
3) Photo Quality. After all, if the photos don't look good, what was the point?
4) Video Recording. This was one of Banana's requests. She uses this function on the Canon A95 she uses at school and wants this functionality. I could live without it, but I have no problems having it either.
5) Cost. If it doesn't fit the price range, it doesn't matter how good of a camera it is.
I have come up with a couple of good cameras. Two of them are pushing the amount we would like to spend. I had hoped to stay under $500 overall (including memory, bag, and batteries), and two of the ones I really like retail for $499 for only the camera.
My first choice is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ20. This is at the top of the class for optics/photo quality. The body of the camera is small and light, but still sturdy. The drawback, only drawback I have found, is the video recording. It only records at 320X240, and apparently doesn't record sound with the video. But wow does it take nice pictures, and I really like the lithium ion rechargable battery system.
My second choice is the Canon Powershot S2. This is a new to market camera, so that concerns me a bit, as there are not as many reviews, but I've had great luck with the Canon digita camera line. The Powershot S2 seems to be a very small step down in optics/photo quality, but picks up the video options Banana wants. This is likely the camera I would buy if I was at the store today (actually I was earlier), but the problem is nobody has them. Only display models. Canon apparently hasn't shipped them yet to most places. We NEED our camera before July 1st when we head to Seattle. They quoted me a few weeks at the store I looked at this afternoon. I was offered the floor model, but I've never thought owning a floor model was a good idea, especially for electronics. Who know how many times it's been dropped, had goo spilt on it, been licked by a rouge child and so on.
My third choice is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5. This is the brother to the FZ20 listed above, with a few less user options, and a little less cost. If I'm not mistaken, the FZ20 is last year's model, and FZ5 is a 2005 model. FZ5 has the same pros and cons of the FZ20.
My fourth choice is one that probably best fits our price range, and that is the Olympus Camedia C-765. The price is right coming in at as low as $225. It is the only 4 megapixel camera in this bunch. It takes great pictures and has very nice optics. It is also the smallest camera of this bunch, so it'll fit into a purse, where the Canon above is pretty big. The Camedia also is very light, almost to the point I am concerned about durability. While I don't expect a camera to be childproof, I do want something that will last for years.
Others that are on the outside, but are still being considered are the Konica Minolta DiMAGE Z5 and the Kodak EasyShare DX7590. Mr. Bill, Banana's father, has an older model of the DX7590, and it takes pretty nice pictures. They used it when they went to the Presidential Inaugaration earlier this year, and those photos turned out great.
I love buying electronics. Perhaps it's because I'm a man. Perhaps it's because I love having new toys to play with. No matter which camera we go with, I'm going to have a lot of fun with it!
Friday, June 17, 2005
Another goofy quiz...
OK, I think I opened pandora's box. Here's another quiz I took (HT: Paul Shafer).
| You scored as Anselm. Anselm is the outstanding theologian of the medieval period.He sees man's primary problem as having failed to render unto God what we owe him, so God becomes man in Christ and gives God what he is due. You should read 'Cur Deus Homo?'
|
Thursday, June 16, 2005
Theological Worldview Quiz
(HT: Tall Skinny Kiwi)
| You scored as Reformed Evangelical. You are a Reformed Evangelical. You take the Bible very seriously because it is God's Word. You most likely hold to TULIP and are sceptical about the possibilities of universal atonement or resistible grace. The most important thing the Church can do is make sure people hear how they can go to heaven when they die.
|
Do-It-Yourself Impressive Theological Constructs
This made me laugh. (HT: Phil Johnson @ Pyromanic). Phil is on staff at Grace Church, John MacArthur's church.
Conspiracy Among Friends...
...I thought that I was the greatest debtor to Divine grace, and would sing the loudest to its praise; but when I came down out of the pulpit, there was a venerable woman who said to me, "You made a blunder in your sermon this evening." I said, "I daresay I made a dozen, good soul, but what was that particular one?" "Why, you said that you would sing the loudest because you owed most to Divine grace; you are but a lad, you do not owe half as much to grace as I do at eighty years of age! I owe more to grace than you, and I will not let you sing the loudest." I found that there was a general conspiracy among the friends that night to put me in the background, and that is where I meant to be, and wished to me; that is where those who sing the loudest long to be, to take the lowest place, and praise most the grace of God in so doing.- C.H. Spurgeon
Saturday, June 11, 2005
Vision Leaks
I had the opportunity to hear Andy Stanley present on this a couple of years ago, and much of what he said has stuck with me. Part of leading others is casting a vision they can follow, and casting it often. I've been part of a number of organizations where we made a concentrated effort on being vision focused, and it definately works.
The article below was taken from Christianity Today.
-----------------------------------------------------
How do you keep the church's passion for ministry from deflating?
Andy Stanley
Vision doesn't stick; it doesn't have natural adhesive. Instead, vision leaks. You've repeated the vision for your church a hundred times. Then someone will ask a question that makes you think, What happened? Didn't they hear what we've said over and over? Don't they know what this church is all about?
You can spot leakage by listening for three things:
1. Prayer requests. What people pray for will tell you more than anything else whether they are locked into the vision and priorities of the church. When you are in a leadership meeting, are the only prayer requests for sick people? When I'm in such a meeting, I say, "Whoa, is anybody in this group burdened for an unchurched or unsaved friend? Yes, let's pray for the sick people. Now, what else can we pray for?"
2. Stories of great things happening in people's lives. If there are no stories, then maybe the vision for life transformation has leaked.
3. What people complain about. If people are complaining about the wrong stuff, then vision is leaking. When they complain about the music, or the parking, or that the church is too big, or there are too many people they don't know, you can respond, "I know. God is blessing us." But it's a sign of vision leakage.
I am often tempted to get frustrated with the people who don't understand the vision, but I have to ask myself some important questions. What do I need to do to assure that we have a compelling vision as an organization, and what must I do to make sure it doesn't leak? If the vision is not communicated in a compelling way, then the organization is going to be unfocused. Wherever focus is lacking, only random activity is left. That's when you wake up and find you don't like the organization you're leading.
It's our job as leaders to get everyone oriented and focused on our main purpose.
What causes leaks?
There are three reasons vision seeps away: success, failure, and everything in between.
Success means your options multiply. Size increases complexity, and complexity can confuse vision.
Our church was at its most efficient when there were just six of us sitting around the table. Everybody knew and understood everything. It was as smart and efficient as the organization has ever been. This efficiency leads to success, and success gives birth to complexity, the enemy of efficiency and vision. Many churches become successful organizations where everyone is busy, but they've lost connection with the vision.
Failure will also knock a hole in your vision, if you let it. When a plan or strategy fails, people are tempted to assume it was the wrong vision. Plans and strategies can always be changed and improved. But vision doesn't change. Visions are simply refined with time.
Our first fundraising campaign was a total failure. No money came in, and I didn't follow up or follow through. One day a wonderful lady in our church came up and asked, "Andy, how's it going with the fundraising?" I answered, "It's not going very well at all." She said, "Do you think God's trying to tell us something?"
She clearly was implying that since the plan wasn't working, then the vision for this church must be wrong.
But I knew the vision was right, so I said, "Yes, I think God is trying to tell us something. He's trying to tell us it was a terrible fundraising idea."
We don't have to change the vision because a plan doesn't work out.
You know what else is tough on vision? Life. Every single day of my life works against the vision. Vision is about what could be and should be; life is about right-this-minute. Life is about the kids and the laundry and the doctor and the house payment.
No wonder vision leaks. Monday comes along and rips it off the wall. The urgent and legitimate needs of today can cause us to lose our vision.
In church life, nothing unfocuses us faster than haphazard, "y'all come" programing. Everybody has a favorite program. But adding too many programs to the church schedule will de-focus your church like nothing else.
Read the rest of the article on Christianity Today's website HERE.
Andy Stanley is pastor of North Point Community Church in Alpharetta, Georgia.
The article below was taken from Christianity Today.
-----------------------------------------------------
How do you keep the church's passion for ministry from deflating?
Andy Stanley
Vision doesn't stick; it doesn't have natural adhesive. Instead, vision leaks. You've repeated the vision for your church a hundred times. Then someone will ask a question that makes you think, What happened? Didn't they hear what we've said over and over? Don't they know what this church is all about?
You can spot leakage by listening for three things:
1. Prayer requests. What people pray for will tell you more than anything else whether they are locked into the vision and priorities of the church. When you are in a leadership meeting, are the only prayer requests for sick people? When I'm in such a meeting, I say, "Whoa, is anybody in this group burdened for an unchurched or unsaved friend? Yes, let's pray for the sick people. Now, what else can we pray for?"
2. Stories of great things happening in people's lives. If there are no stories, then maybe the vision for life transformation has leaked.
3. What people complain about. If people are complaining about the wrong stuff, then vision is leaking. When they complain about the music, or the parking, or that the church is too big, or there are too many people they don't know, you can respond, "I know. God is blessing us." But it's a sign of vision leakage.
I am often tempted to get frustrated with the people who don't understand the vision, but I have to ask myself some important questions. What do I need to do to assure that we have a compelling vision as an organization, and what must I do to make sure it doesn't leak? If the vision is not communicated in a compelling way, then the organization is going to be unfocused. Wherever focus is lacking, only random activity is left. That's when you wake up and find you don't like the organization you're leading.
It's our job as leaders to get everyone oriented and focused on our main purpose.
What causes leaks?
There are three reasons vision seeps away: success, failure, and everything in between.
Success means your options multiply. Size increases complexity, and complexity can confuse vision.
Our church was at its most efficient when there were just six of us sitting around the table. Everybody knew and understood everything. It was as smart and efficient as the organization has ever been. This efficiency leads to success, and success gives birth to complexity, the enemy of efficiency and vision. Many churches become successful organizations where everyone is busy, but they've lost connection with the vision.
Failure will also knock a hole in your vision, if you let it. When a plan or strategy fails, people are tempted to assume it was the wrong vision. Plans and strategies can always be changed and improved. But vision doesn't change. Visions are simply refined with time.
Our first fundraising campaign was a total failure. No money came in, and I didn't follow up or follow through. One day a wonderful lady in our church came up and asked, "Andy, how's it going with the fundraising?" I answered, "It's not going very well at all." She said, "Do you think God's trying to tell us something?"
She clearly was implying that since the plan wasn't working, then the vision for this church must be wrong.
But I knew the vision was right, so I said, "Yes, I think God is trying to tell us something. He's trying to tell us it was a terrible fundraising idea."
We don't have to change the vision because a plan doesn't work out.
You know what else is tough on vision? Life. Every single day of my life works against the vision. Vision is about what could be and should be; life is about right-this-minute. Life is about the kids and the laundry and the doctor and the house payment.
No wonder vision leaks. Monday comes along and rips it off the wall. The urgent and legitimate needs of today can cause us to lose our vision.
In church life, nothing unfocuses us faster than haphazard, "y'all come" programing. Everybody has a favorite program. But adding too many programs to the church schedule will de-focus your church like nothing else.
Read the rest of the article on Christianity Today's website HERE.
Andy Stanley is pastor of North Point Community Church in Alpharetta, Georgia.
Friday, June 10, 2005
Christians and Sex
Christians and Sex: Sexual Issues in the Church
An article in Leadership magazine tipped me to this resource and these stats.
An article in Leadership magazine tipped me to this resource and these stats.
- Nearly 9 in 10 pastors are counseling a parishioner on sexual issues once a year or more.
- 71% of pastors and 49% of laity are "very satisfied" with their marriage.
- 55% of pastors and 64% of laity would like their sexual intimacy to be more frequent.
- 5% of pastors and 14% of laity have committed adultery. The primary reason was marital dissatisfaction.
- Laity respondents are more likely than pastors to confess adultery to their spouses (45% to 20%).
- Very few churches have established policies to protect pastors from sexual temptation. The most frequent policy is to have a window in the pastor's office door (27%).
- Almost three-fourths of pastors told us they have been propositioned while in ministry (72%), with 8 percent reporting enticements a few times per year.
Warped...
Man Gets Life in Prison
A 19-year-old Texas man, Gerardo Flores, was sentenced to life in prison for his role in the death of his girlfriend's unborn twins. Erica Basoria, 17, acknowledged asking Flores to help end her pregnancy by stepping on her stomach. She had earlier started jogging and hitting herself to induce a miscarriage. When her efforts failed, she asked her boyfriend to help.
The conviction under the Texas fetal-protection law could not be extended to the mother because she had a legal right to an abortion.
-----
And to think these children could have been adopted and spared all of this mess.
If you are up for it, please keep Justin Taylor and his wife (and hopefully new son!) in your prayers. Justin hasn't been blogging because they rushed off to Florida. To hear more about it (and to contribute to his adoption fund!) go HERE.
A 19-year-old Texas man, Gerardo Flores, was sentenced to life in prison for his role in the death of his girlfriend's unborn twins. Erica Basoria, 17, acknowledged asking Flores to help end her pregnancy by stepping on her stomach. She had earlier started jogging and hitting herself to induce a miscarriage. When her efforts failed, she asked her boyfriend to help.
The conviction under the Texas fetal-protection law could not be extended to the mother because she had a legal right to an abortion.
-----
And to think these children could have been adopted and spared all of this mess.
If you are up for it, please keep Justin Taylor and his wife (and hopefully new son!) in your prayers. Justin hasn't been blogging because they rushed off to Florida. To hear more about it (and to contribute to his adoption fund!) go HERE.
Updates...
My father has taken the job with the State Penitentiary, he starts Monday. I have one more finals related item - gasp - a Greek test. I have one more Greek course (next Fall) assuming I pass the enterence exam September 2nd. I am going to do a dance when I am done with Greek. I will be spending the weekend helping my fiancee move so I may not be posting much until next week.
Thursday, June 09, 2005
Minnesota Twins and Johan Santana
Tonight the Twins put a spanking on the Arizona Diamondbacks in interleague play, winning 10-0. Johan Santana once again pitched a magnificant game, giving up only 4 hits (getting one hit himself) and no runs in a complete game shut out. Johan Santana is a stud. The Cy Young last year was just the tip of the iceberg for his career I think. It's hard not to like the guy, he works hard, isn't a glory hound, and simply plays and pitches in a way that honors the tradition of the game. I've been a lukewarm Twins fan since my first Twins game in 1985 at the Metrodome (Twins lost to the Brewers that day, Teddy Higuara (sp?) pitched for the Brewers). The current lineup of the Twins is very interesting to me. They work hard, do the small things, and regularly win games. I do hope they get a new stadium though. I don't go to their games, because I hate the Dome. Instead I go to St. Paul Saints games at Midway stadium, for much lower prices, more fun, and an enormously better atmosphere. Sure the Saints are low level minor leaguers, but I love them nonetheless. I've mentioned the Saints in previous blog posts, and anybody who wants to check it out, let me know and we'll catch a game.
Now back to my regularly scheduled blogging...
For those so inclined, I would appreciate your prayers for my father. He lost his job unexpectedly a couple of weeks ago, and is considering a few options. One of which is returning to the South Dakota State Penitentiary where he worked years ago. I got news tonight that a friend of mine, actually a former roommate, now has the job my father was terminated from. There are good and bad things to the State job, and it's a tough time in life to have lost his job. Pray for wisdom on his part, and God's guidance on the process.
Now back to my regularly scheduled blogging...
For those so inclined, I would appreciate your prayers for my father. He lost his job unexpectedly a couple of weeks ago, and is considering a few options. One of which is returning to the South Dakota State Penitentiary where he worked years ago. I got news tonight that a friend of mine, actually a former roommate, now has the job my father was terminated from. There are good and bad things to the State job, and it's a tough time in life to have lost his job. Pray for wisdom on his part, and God's guidance on the process.
Wednesday, June 08, 2005
Job search and present ministry
Just a few ruminations from me today. I've been rolling over in my mind some job openings. There is one in particular that might be a good fit, but I have a few concerns I'll have to address with them before I decide if I might fit. I'll get back to that in a second though. What's really on my mind is the process (and integrity) of how do I handle this with my current church. I have a good relationship there, but it's not where I feel I need to be to continue to gain ministry skills. I've been there for 2.5 years as a non-paid staff person. I preach occassional, I've done college, Sr. High, and Jr. High ministry there, as well as some adult teaching. I've worked on developing leadership and vision with the staff, and many other things as needed. Basically I've filled in the cracks when and where needed. I plan on being open about it, but I'm not sure at what point in the process I should be involving them. I have applied for some other positions and been open about it, but those things probably wouldn't have kept me from my ministry there.
Ideally I would like to find an associate pastoral position in a Baptist General Conference church. I'm pretty OK with the Covenant churches and the E-Free churches as well, and possibly a Southern Baptist church as well. I suppose there are some other groups out there that I would fit with without compromising what I believe in, and I'll deal with that as it comes I guess. I am passionate about the lost sheep of the pews, those marginal and apathetic pew potatoes. I want to find ways to reach and excite them for the glory of Jesus. I'd love to find a ministry position where I can teach people how to lead, do some teaching and preaching, and improve church processes. I'm not gifted to lead worship, and while I have quite a bit of experience in youth ministry, I'm not necessarily gifted in that area. I'd love to work with young adults (18+), small groups, singles and a handful of other areas.
My added dillema is I'm somewhat limited in where I can live (though I'd make something work for the right position), so that I can finish school. Of course the implied component of that is a church that is willing to allow me to keep working on my education over the next year. I have 4 semsters left of schooling. Plus, I'm getting married in December, so that will further complicate things for me.
If you are so inclined, I'd appreciate your prayers for guidance from God in this area. I've been praying for quite some time, but no clarity yet.
Ideally I would like to find an associate pastoral position in a Baptist General Conference church. I'm pretty OK with the Covenant churches and the E-Free churches as well, and possibly a Southern Baptist church as well. I suppose there are some other groups out there that I would fit with without compromising what I believe in, and I'll deal with that as it comes I guess. I am passionate about the lost sheep of the pews, those marginal and apathetic pew potatoes. I want to find ways to reach and excite them for the glory of Jesus. I'd love to find a ministry position where I can teach people how to lead, do some teaching and preaching, and improve church processes. I'm not gifted to lead worship, and while I have quite a bit of experience in youth ministry, I'm not necessarily gifted in that area. I'd love to work with young adults (18+), small groups, singles and a handful of other areas.
My added dillema is I'm somewhat limited in where I can live (though I'd make something work for the right position), so that I can finish school. Of course the implied component of that is a church that is willing to allow me to keep working on my education over the next year. I have 4 semsters left of schooling. Plus, I'm getting married in December, so that will further complicate things for me.
If you are so inclined, I'd appreciate your prayers for guidance from God in this area. I've been praying for quite some time, but no clarity yet.
Friday, June 03, 2005
An Emergent Apology?
Don't know what you all think about the Emergent Church movement, but there is an interesting thing going on at the moment. I thought I would point this out for those who may be interested either from a positive, negative, or sheer intellectual standpoint.
I have had the opportunity to interact personally with a good number of people who consider themselves part of the Emergent movement. Doug Pagitt actually went to my seminary a few years back, and of course his church is not too far away from where I live (11.4 miles according to Mapquest.com). A number of other students at school with me would openly consider themselves part of the Emergent movement (Jeff and Mark are two good examples), so I get to interact with this group of Christians on a limited, but regular basis.
My general experience has been positive. I've discussed this on a few other places on the net, and I feel that we as the non-Emergent church can learn quite a bit from them. I don't think I've studied all of their ideas fully enough to have a complete opinion, but there are a few points theologically that I do not completely mesh with the EC. That being said, I think I have much more in common with them than I do with say a Catholic Christian for instance. What I do think we should get from them (if nothing else) is the way in which they are meeting people's needs and interacting with the world. They are making connections in ways, place, and in people groups that the traditional church models do not do a good job of reaching. They are sharing the Gospel of Christ with people who need it. Joel Osteen is a much greater problem than the EC in my opinion. I think we do need to hold the EC movement accountable, and press them to remain orthodox in their views, but within the range of orthodoxy I think we need to let them have some leash and see where they take things. I know some who may read my blog will be surprized I am not taking a hard (or harder) stance against the EC, sorry to disappoint you. But I also don't think we (the church) give them free reign either. I am of the opinion it's more of a fad than anything, and 10 years from now we'll look back and wonder why we wasted bandwidth and brain power on the subject. Let's share the Gospel. Let's keep talking with the Emergent Church. I'm not saying join, agree, or embrace, but let's keep channels of communication open with them, as they might have something to teach the rest of us.
I have had the opportunity to interact personally with a good number of people who consider themselves part of the Emergent movement. Doug Pagitt actually went to my seminary a few years back, and of course his church is not too far away from where I live (11.4 miles according to Mapquest.com). A number of other students at school with me would openly consider themselves part of the Emergent movement (Jeff and Mark are two good examples), so I get to interact with this group of Christians on a limited, but regular basis.
My general experience has been positive. I've discussed this on a few other places on the net, and I feel that we as the non-Emergent church can learn quite a bit from them. I don't think I've studied all of their ideas fully enough to have a complete opinion, but there are a few points theologically that I do not completely mesh with the EC. That being said, I think I have much more in common with them than I do with say a Catholic Christian for instance. What I do think we should get from them (if nothing else) is the way in which they are meeting people's needs and interacting with the world. They are making connections in ways, place, and in people groups that the traditional church models do not do a good job of reaching. They are sharing the Gospel of Christ with people who need it. Joel Osteen is a much greater problem than the EC in my opinion. I think we do need to hold the EC movement accountable, and press them to remain orthodox in their views, but within the range of orthodoxy I think we need to let them have some leash and see where they take things. I know some who may read my blog will be surprized I am not taking a hard (or harder) stance against the EC, sorry to disappoint you. But I also don't think we (the church) give them free reign either. I am of the opinion it's more of a fad than anything, and 10 years from now we'll look back and wonder why we wasted bandwidth and brain power on the subject. Let's share the Gospel. Let's keep talking with the Emergent Church. I'm not saying join, agree, or embrace, but let's keep channels of communication open with them, as they might have something to teach the rest of us.
Wednesday, June 01, 2005
Book Review: Sex and the Supremecy of Christ
A week or so ago, Justin Taylor of Between Two Worlds put out a call for bloggers to review a book he had a part in - Sex and the Supremecy of Christ. I was one of the lucky few who got in early enough to be blessed with the opportunity, and below entails my thoughts on the book. I suspect I will come back to this book again from time to time, and will post additional thoughts and comments as I let it percolate in my brain.
First, I would like to comment on how appropriate the subject for the book is for Christians today. As Christians, we are called to glorify God in all that we do, and within that fall our sexuality. This is often directly opposed by how the world that surrounds us views sex and sexuality. As yet to be perfected Christians we are impacted by the graphicness and pervasiveness of the inappropriate and negative message that society showers us with on a daily basis. This book serves to begin to balance that out by giving us a clear explanation on God’s design for sex.
What I liked best in the book:
First, I greatly appreciate the readability of this book. With authors like John Piper and Albert Mohler, there is always the chance that it could quickly become very heady, making it a difficult read for the entry level reader. This is a book that I think most high school students could read, and I would recommend it for that application.
I suspect this book will be challenging to those who have been taught to be ashamed of sex and sexuality. It is a tragedy that some in the body of Christ have perverted one of God’s greatest gifts to us in this way. This book takes great steps to undoing some of that harm, and is a great reference for developing a biblically informed view of sexuality. While it is not specifically written as an apologetic against this, it nonetheless would serve ministries well that are helping people overcome those feelings of shame.
The part I enjoyed reading the most was the section on Martin Luther and his wife. It added a needed lightness to what can sometimes be a heavy subject. It also was great to get a window into the life of one of the most influential Christians of all time.
The section I initially felt I would not find very interesting was Dr. Mohler’s segment on homosexuality. I was pleasantly surprised by what he had to say. I almost always find Dr. Mohler interesting, but the past two years I have been filled to the top with data, opinions, and stories about homosexuals and Christians. Dr. Mohler made it interesting, and informative, and I suspect I will read the section again. He did not present anything new to me, but he always has a way of saying things that makes me say “I wish I could have said it that way.”
I grew up in the church, and I can honestly say I did not hear much regarding any of the topics covered in this book spoken about at church. Sex was something people talked about in private. Sex was something that jokes were made about. Sex was everybody’s dirty little secret. I think this book serves to shine a light in an area of much darkness for Christians throughout the world. I highly recommend the book, front to back, without any hesitation. I suspect I will be buying a few copies to share with some important people in my life who might greatly benefit from it.
What I would do different/like to see changed or added:
My criticisms are very limited. I would love to see this offered as a 3 part paperback series, with a Bible study guide to go with it. That way churches could utilize different segments with different groups or at different times. I honestly don’t know if something like that is in the works, but I would suggest it if not.
Piggybacking on my previous idea, a section (or perhaps a separate tool) with sermon outlines would another great blessing for the church. Providing a framework for pastors to introduce these subjects to their congregations would be a wonderful gift. While we all know we should be hearing these kinds of things from our pulpits, all too often we are not, and we can see where that has been getting the church. Anything to enable and encourage pastors to utilize this material in their churches would add to it’s impact.
I would also like to see an online resource with current info and articles pertaining the subjects discussed. There is a very nice list of references, but they are to print materials. The world is changing, and while I see the humor in asking for electronic info from a paper book, I still think it would be a nice addition for those seeking to grow deeper in these subject areas.
Final Analysis:
I give it 5 of 5 stars, with a hearty reccommendation. I suspect this will be an award winning book, topping many book lists and must read lists in the next few years.
First, I would like to comment on how appropriate the subject for the book is for Christians today. As Christians, we are called to glorify God in all that we do, and within that fall our sexuality. This is often directly opposed by how the world that surrounds us views sex and sexuality. As yet to be perfected Christians we are impacted by the graphicness and pervasiveness of the inappropriate and negative message that society showers us with on a daily basis. This book serves to begin to balance that out by giving us a clear explanation on God’s design for sex.
What I liked best in the book:
First, I greatly appreciate the readability of this book. With authors like John Piper and Albert Mohler, there is always the chance that it could quickly become very heady, making it a difficult read for the entry level reader. This is a book that I think most high school students could read, and I would recommend it for that application.
I suspect this book will be challenging to those who have been taught to be ashamed of sex and sexuality. It is a tragedy that some in the body of Christ have perverted one of God’s greatest gifts to us in this way. This book takes great steps to undoing some of that harm, and is a great reference for developing a biblically informed view of sexuality. While it is not specifically written as an apologetic against this, it nonetheless would serve ministries well that are helping people overcome those feelings of shame.
The part I enjoyed reading the most was the section on Martin Luther and his wife. It added a needed lightness to what can sometimes be a heavy subject. It also was great to get a window into the life of one of the most influential Christians of all time.
The section I initially felt I would not find very interesting was Dr. Mohler’s segment on homosexuality. I was pleasantly surprised by what he had to say. I almost always find Dr. Mohler interesting, but the past two years I have been filled to the top with data, opinions, and stories about homosexuals and Christians. Dr. Mohler made it interesting, and informative, and I suspect I will read the section again. He did not present anything new to me, but he always has a way of saying things that makes me say “I wish I could have said it that way.”
I grew up in the church, and I can honestly say I did not hear much regarding any of the topics covered in this book spoken about at church. Sex was something people talked about in private. Sex was something that jokes were made about. Sex was everybody’s dirty little secret. I think this book serves to shine a light in an area of much darkness for Christians throughout the world. I highly recommend the book, front to back, without any hesitation. I suspect I will be buying a few copies to share with some important people in my life who might greatly benefit from it.
What I would do different/like to see changed or added:
My criticisms are very limited. I would love to see this offered as a 3 part paperback series, with a Bible study guide to go with it. That way churches could utilize different segments with different groups or at different times. I honestly don’t know if something like that is in the works, but I would suggest it if not.
Piggybacking on my previous idea, a section (or perhaps a separate tool) with sermon outlines would another great blessing for the church. Providing a framework for pastors to introduce these subjects to their congregations would be a wonderful gift. While we all know we should be hearing these kinds of things from our pulpits, all too often we are not, and we can see where that has been getting the church. Anything to enable and encourage pastors to utilize this material in their churches would add to it’s impact.
I would also like to see an online resource with current info and articles pertaining the subjects discussed. There is a very nice list of references, but they are to print materials. The world is changing, and while I see the humor in asking for electronic info from a paper book, I still think it would be a nice addition for those seeking to grow deeper in these subject areas.
Final Analysis:
I give it 5 of 5 stars, with a hearty reccommendation. I suspect this will be an award winning book, topping many book lists and must read lists in the next few years.
Tuesday, May 31, 2005
Recovery of the Southern Baptists...
Today (Tuesday, May 31), Dr. Albert Mohler has an excellent article reviewing the transformation of the Southern Baptist Conference from the mid to late 70's to present. It's an excellent read if you are interested in the history and development of the SBC.
Some Essentials to Building a Great and Growing Church
Some Essentials to Building a Great and Growing Church
1. A steadily increasing number of LEADERS.
2. A steadily increasing number of GIVERS.
3. A steadily increasing number of SERVANTS who have identified their God-given spiritual gifts, temperament, and ministry passion and are being fruitful and fulfilled in their unique contribution.
4. A steadily increasing number of GROUPS where significant relationships can be developed.
5. A clear and compelling MISSION that everyone can articulate and that permeates and drives everything that is done.
6. An effective means of OUTREACH.
7. Great PUBLIC SERVICES.
8. An effective means of PARTICIPATORY DECISION-MAKING.
9. HIGH VISIBILITY in the community.
10. Adequate PARKING.
11. Adequate FACILITIES.
12. An effective means of DEVELOPING BELIEVERS INTO "5 G's (grace, growth, group, gifts, giving) PEOPLE".
13. An effective means of HELPING HURTING PEOPLE.
14. A strong feeling and reality of COMMUNITY.
15. An effective means of QUICKLY ASSIMILATING NEW PEOPLE into the "vital" life of the church.
16. An emphasis on and modeling of the true LIFE-TRANSFORMATION that God does in human lives.
17. A quality NURSERY and CHILDREN'S PROGRAM.
- From New Life Bible Church, Norman, OK
1. A steadily increasing number of LEADERS.
2. A steadily increasing number of GIVERS.
3. A steadily increasing number of SERVANTS who have identified their God-given spiritual gifts, temperament, and ministry passion and are being fruitful and fulfilled in their unique contribution.
4. A steadily increasing number of GROUPS where significant relationships can be developed.
5. A clear and compelling MISSION that everyone can articulate and that permeates and drives everything that is done.
6. An effective means of OUTREACH.
7. Great PUBLIC SERVICES.
8. An effective means of PARTICIPATORY DECISION-MAKING.
9. HIGH VISIBILITY in the community.
10. Adequate PARKING.
11. Adequate FACILITIES.
12. An effective means of DEVELOPING BELIEVERS INTO "5 G's (grace, growth, group, gifts, giving) PEOPLE".
13. An effective means of HELPING HURTING PEOPLE.
14. A strong feeling and reality of COMMUNITY.
15. An effective means of QUICKLY ASSIMILATING NEW PEOPLE into the "vital" life of the church.
16. An emphasis on and modeling of the true LIFE-TRANSFORMATION that God does in human lives.
17. A quality NURSERY and CHILDREN'S PROGRAM.
- From New Life Bible Church, Norman, OK
Sunday, May 29, 2005
What Leaders Do...
Taken from SmartLeadership.com
WHAT LEADERS DO:
L- Learn. All leaders are learners. When you cease to learn, you cease to lead. "The one who has ceased to learn ought not to be allowed to wander around loose in these dangers days." -- M. M. Coady.
E- Engage. A leader will be able to influence followers only in proportion to how much she engages them on an emotional level. SmartLeaders engage people in four ways (see The Rules of Engagement): a consistent ethic, a contagious enthusiasm, a course of excellence, and continual empowerment.
A- Anticipate. Leaders are always asking two questions: "What happens next?" and "What happens after what happens next?" Although no one can predict THE future, effective leaders constantly anticipate possible futures.
D- Demonstrate. Leaders model for followers the qualities required for success, when SmartLeaders demonstrate integrity, innovation and intelligence. You attract what you reflect, but you reproduce what you are.
E- Evolve. Leaders never stop growing. SmartLeaders realize that they are on a journey that requires the conquering of ever-steepening mountains. Yesterday's approaches, attitudes and attributes do not always help in today's climate. The heights that a leader obtains are directly proportional to the level to which they evolve. Stop changing and you die.
R- Reproduce. Leaders reproduce other leaders. The ultimate action of SmartLeaders is that they reproduce other SmartLeaders. A leader's successors determine his success.
S- Solve. One of the great works of leadership is problem solving. While problem solving is not the sole work of leadership, it is a defining characteristic. Your ability to successfully solve problems will determine
your stability. Your ability to influence others will determine your success.
H- Hope. A SmartLeader's actions will inspire hope in her followers. She has the unique ability to communicate hope in all that she does. Napoleon rightly quipped, "A leader is a dealer in hope." But remember, the SmartLeader must have a vision in which all hope is focused. Hope without
vision is aimless wandering.
I- Initiate. Leaders take action, they initiate, invent, adapt and improvise. An indecisive person will never lead. One mantra for leaders is Napoleon Hill's famous avowal "Do It Now!"
P- Persevere. When seized by a vision, SmartLeaders never give up! They persevere until completion. Samuel Johnson writes, "Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."
In thinking about leadership, take time to ponder the acts of leaders. Thinking precedes action and action precedes feelings. SmartLeaders determine the actions of leadership and then act as leaders.
WHAT LEADERS DO:
L- Learn. All leaders are learners. When you cease to learn, you cease to lead. "The one who has ceased to learn ought not to be allowed to wander around loose in these dangers days." -- M. M. Coady.
E- Engage. A leader will be able to influence followers only in proportion to how much she engages them on an emotional level. SmartLeaders engage people in four ways (see The Rules of Engagement): a consistent ethic, a contagious enthusiasm, a course of excellence, and continual empowerment.
A- Anticipate. Leaders are always asking two questions: "What happens next?" and "What happens after what happens next?" Although no one can predict THE future, effective leaders constantly anticipate possible futures.
D- Demonstrate. Leaders model for followers the qualities required for success, when SmartLeaders demonstrate integrity, innovation and intelligence. You attract what you reflect, but you reproduce what you are.
E- Evolve. Leaders never stop growing. SmartLeaders realize that they are on a journey that requires the conquering of ever-steepening mountains. Yesterday's approaches, attitudes and attributes do not always help in today's climate. The heights that a leader obtains are directly proportional to the level to which they evolve. Stop changing and you die.
R- Reproduce. Leaders reproduce other leaders. The ultimate action of SmartLeaders is that they reproduce other SmartLeaders. A leader's successors determine his success.
S- Solve. One of the great works of leadership is problem solving. While problem solving is not the sole work of leadership, it is a defining characteristic. Your ability to successfully solve problems will determine
your stability. Your ability to influence others will determine your success.
H- Hope. A SmartLeader's actions will inspire hope in her followers. She has the unique ability to communicate hope in all that she does. Napoleon rightly quipped, "A leader is a dealer in hope." But remember, the SmartLeader must have a vision in which all hope is focused. Hope without
vision is aimless wandering.
I- Initiate. Leaders take action, they initiate, invent, adapt and improvise. An indecisive person will never lead. One mantra for leaders is Napoleon Hill's famous avowal "Do It Now!"
P- Persevere. When seized by a vision, SmartLeaders never give up! They persevere until completion. Samuel Johnson writes, "Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."
In thinking about leadership, take time to ponder the acts of leaders. Thinking precedes action and action precedes feelings. SmartLeaders determine the actions of leadership and then act as leaders.
Saturday, May 28, 2005
Memorial Day and such...
As I sit here prepairing to preach tomorrow on Genesis 1:1, my mind keeps wondering onto the subject of Memorial Day. My sermon is written, so I can afford a bit of time and thought at this point.
My generation has escaped war. We were too young by a few years to be part of the Desert Storm action, and for the most part, we are too old to join in for the Iraq war. Without doubt there are people of my generation who chose a military career (or in the reserves) who are part of Iraq, but those who signed up after High School would have fulfilled thier duties on their initial plan.
I am neither pro-war nor a pacifist. I prefer to avoid war when possible, but that's not always possible. There is evil in the world, and at times we have to stand up to that evil in a physical way.
I greatly appreciate all that has been sacrificed to afford me the luxery I experience by living in the United States of America. The millions of lives lost and altered. I cannot fathom how these lives and families were changed, and will not devalue their sacrifice by trying to so. All I can do is say thanks. To all the Vets I say thank you for doing your duty. Thank you for going above and beyond your duty. I pray you feel valued this year on Memorial Day.
My generation has escaped war. We were too young by a few years to be part of the Desert Storm action, and for the most part, we are too old to join in for the Iraq war. Without doubt there are people of my generation who chose a military career (or in the reserves) who are part of Iraq, but those who signed up after High School would have fulfilled thier duties on their initial plan.
I am neither pro-war nor a pacifist. I prefer to avoid war when possible, but that's not always possible. There is evil in the world, and at times we have to stand up to that evil in a physical way.
I greatly appreciate all that has been sacrificed to afford me the luxery I experience by living in the United States of America. The millions of lives lost and altered. I cannot fathom how these lives and families were changed, and will not devalue their sacrifice by trying to so. All I can do is say thanks. To all the Vets I say thank you for doing your duty. Thank you for going above and beyond your duty. I pray you feel valued this year on Memorial Day.
Thursday, May 26, 2005
An opportunity I'm looking forward to...
Justin Taylor of Between Two Worlds blog is offering the opportunity to review the new book "Sex and the Supremecy of Christ. I have taken him up on that offer and am really looking forward to reading this book. I previewed it a bit today, and am really excited for what it brings - a single resource covering many of the issues relating to Christianity and sexuality. There are a number of authors in on the writing of this, many of whom fall into my "favorites" category.
In a rather strange twist, I have received a couple of other books in the mail this past week, one a pre-release that wanted me to preview it and consider using it in my ministry and sharing it with others, and the other is a new Bible type by NLT. I primarily use the ESV Bible, but I do enjoy reading the NLT for times where I want to cover large chunks of scripture rather than deep theological reflection and scholarly study. I do usually preach from the NIV because that is the Bible the church I am at has chosen to use (most people have that version, the pew Bibles are that version). Before this last week I had never gotten books like this. It's interesting, and something I would enjoy if it kept happening in the future. I love books, and I love reading books. I don't know if I would want to do this as a profession, but would love to do a few a year in the years to come.
I will be blogging my thoughts on the forthcoming Sex and the Supremecy of Christ as a condition of my getting to review the book. I have high expectations for the book, and I expect it will meet or exceed those expectations.
In a rather strange twist, I have received a couple of other books in the mail this past week, one a pre-release that wanted me to preview it and consider using it in my ministry and sharing it with others, and the other is a new Bible type by NLT. I primarily use the ESV Bible, but I do enjoy reading the NLT for times where I want to cover large chunks of scripture rather than deep theological reflection and scholarly study. I do usually preach from the NIV because that is the Bible the church I am at has chosen to use (most people have that version, the pew Bibles are that version). Before this last week I had never gotten books like this. It's interesting, and something I would enjoy if it kept happening in the future. I love books, and I love reading books. I don't know if I would want to do this as a profession, but would love to do a few a year in the years to come.
I will be blogging my thoughts on the forthcoming Sex and the Supremecy of Christ as a condition of my getting to review the book. I have high expectations for the book, and I expect it will meet or exceed those expectations.
Wednesday, May 25, 2005
Biblical Preaching Is About Life Change, Not Sermon Form
Biblical preaching is not about structure. It occurs when people listen, are enabled to hear that God is addressing them as God addressed the world of the Scriptures, and are enabled to respond.
An article by John Ortberg
The core value of preaching that changes lives is it's biblical. You and I don't change lives; God changes lives. For 2,000 years, God has used the power of this Word to convict stubborn hearts of sin, to move cold spirits to repentance, and to lift faltering lives to hope.
The question that causes a fair amount of controversy is what makes preaching biblical.
It's not about form. Often people think what makes preaching biblical is a particular style or structure. Where I grew up, people talked about three categories for preaching: topical, which was often regarded as not very biblical, textual, where the main point comes from a Scripture verse, which was considered more biblical, and expository, which is difficult to get a clear definition of. Expository is a word that gets thrown around a lot. Some people think of it as verse-by-verse preaching, or where points and sub-points are from one text in Scripture.
There are a number of problems with thinking one particular style or structure of preaching is the only kind that's biblical.
One problem is Jesus didn't do that kind of expository preaching. Mostly he told stories and the implications for listeners' lives. The apostles didn't do that kind of expository preaching. In the New Testament you don't see any sermon that goes verse by verse through an Old Testament text. I'm not saying that kind of preaching is a bad thing. It's important that people become biblically literate. But what makes preaching biblical is not its structure. To be biblical does not mean the preacher follows a particular form that, after all, human beings created.
It's about relevance, application, and enablement. William D. Thompson, author of "Preaching Biblically," writes: "Biblical preaching is when listeners are enabled to see how their world, like the biblical world, is addressed by the Word of God." It is important not to be superficial when it comes to what makes preaching biblical. How many Bible verses a sermon has does not determine whether or not it's biblical. You can have a hundred verses in a sermon and misinterpret every one of them. It is not the structure. Biblical preaching occurs when people listen, are enabled to hear that God is addressing them as God addressed the world of the Scriptures, and are enabled to respond.
Far too many sermons have lots of information about the Bible but are not really biblical preaching because they do not call and enable people to respond to the Word. There is lots of information about the Bible--exegetical, historical or theological--with maybe a few applications tacked on the end.
It's about working the soap of the Word deeply through the stained fibers of hearers' hearts. What happens when the Word addresses people? In Ephesians 5:25-26, Paul has a wonderful metaphor. He says, "Husbands, love your wives just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her in order to make her holy by cleansing her with the washing of water by the Word."
The church is to be made holy by being cleansed with the washing of the water of the Word. Why do you wash something? Because it's dirty. What happens when you wash something? Soap and water move through the fibers and lift out impurities from the fabric.
When we and our congregations come before God, our hearts are like that. They are cluttered with false beliefs, attitudes, misguided intentions, wrong perceptions.
I could tell you what a few of mine are. I'm walking down the street. Somebody wants money. I find myself looking away from him because I don't even want to be reminded of that need, and I don't want to feel guilty by not giving him something. Or I'm at a convenience store in a line of people, and the person behind the counter doesn't speak English well, and my reflexive thoughts are, I'm in a hurry. Why can't they get somebody that speaks English well around here? Or another time I'm in church standing next to somebody who's important and the thoughts that run through my mind are, This is an important person. I wonder what I might be able to say to make a connection because he or she is important.
Those are just a few thoughts in my mind that are dirty. They equip me for bad works. They make bad feelings and behaviors almost inevitable. Imagine having a mind cleansed of all that. Imagine when you're with somebody, your first thought is to pray for them and bless them. Imagine that if you're challenged, your first thought is to look to God for strength.
That's what it would be like to have a mind washed by the Word, and that's your goal for the people to whom you speak. That's the goal of biblical preaching. The goal is not to get vast amounts of exegetical information into people.
My goal is not to get people all the way through the Bible. My goal is to get the Bible all the way through people.
Biblical preaching answers three questions: What must hearers know, feel, do? To do that I ask three questions. What do I want people to know? What do I want people to feel? What do I want people to do? I think about these questions for every message I do because if I don't address the mind and heart and will--if I can't answer those questions--then I need not deliver this message because it's not going to wash their minds in the Word.
Your goal is to wash the minds of your people in the Word so that Christ is formed in them. That's biblical preaching.
John Ortberg is teaching pastor at Menlo Park Presbyterian Church in Menlo Park, California.
An article by John Ortberg
The core value of preaching that changes lives is it's biblical. You and I don't change lives; God changes lives. For 2,000 years, God has used the power of this Word to convict stubborn hearts of sin, to move cold spirits to repentance, and to lift faltering lives to hope.
The question that causes a fair amount of controversy is what makes preaching biblical.
It's not about form. Often people think what makes preaching biblical is a particular style or structure. Where I grew up, people talked about three categories for preaching: topical, which was often regarded as not very biblical, textual, where the main point comes from a Scripture verse, which was considered more biblical, and expository, which is difficult to get a clear definition of. Expository is a word that gets thrown around a lot. Some people think of it as verse-by-verse preaching, or where points and sub-points are from one text in Scripture.
There are a number of problems with thinking one particular style or structure of preaching is the only kind that's biblical.
One problem is Jesus didn't do that kind of expository preaching. Mostly he told stories and the implications for listeners' lives. The apostles didn't do that kind of expository preaching. In the New Testament you don't see any sermon that goes verse by verse through an Old Testament text. I'm not saying that kind of preaching is a bad thing. It's important that people become biblically literate. But what makes preaching biblical is not its structure. To be biblical does not mean the preacher follows a particular form that, after all, human beings created.
It's about relevance, application, and enablement. William D. Thompson, author of "Preaching Biblically," writes: "Biblical preaching is when listeners are enabled to see how their world, like the biblical world, is addressed by the Word of God." It is important not to be superficial when it comes to what makes preaching biblical. How many Bible verses a sermon has does not determine whether or not it's biblical. You can have a hundred verses in a sermon and misinterpret every one of them. It is not the structure. Biblical preaching occurs when people listen, are enabled to hear that God is addressing them as God addressed the world of the Scriptures, and are enabled to respond.
Far too many sermons have lots of information about the Bible but are not really biblical preaching because they do not call and enable people to respond to the Word. There is lots of information about the Bible--exegetical, historical or theological--with maybe a few applications tacked on the end.
It's about working the soap of the Word deeply through the stained fibers of hearers' hearts. What happens when the Word addresses people? In Ephesians 5:25-26, Paul has a wonderful metaphor. He says, "Husbands, love your wives just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her in order to make her holy by cleansing her with the washing of water by the Word."
The church is to be made holy by being cleansed with the washing of the water of the Word. Why do you wash something? Because it's dirty. What happens when you wash something? Soap and water move through the fibers and lift out impurities from the fabric.
When we and our congregations come before God, our hearts are like that. They are cluttered with false beliefs, attitudes, misguided intentions, wrong perceptions.
I could tell you what a few of mine are. I'm walking down the street. Somebody wants money. I find myself looking away from him because I don't even want to be reminded of that need, and I don't want to feel guilty by not giving him something. Or I'm at a convenience store in a line of people, and the person behind the counter doesn't speak English well, and my reflexive thoughts are, I'm in a hurry. Why can't they get somebody that speaks English well around here? Or another time I'm in church standing next to somebody who's important and the thoughts that run through my mind are, This is an important person. I wonder what I might be able to say to make a connection because he or she is important.
Those are just a few thoughts in my mind that are dirty. They equip me for bad works. They make bad feelings and behaviors almost inevitable. Imagine having a mind cleansed of all that. Imagine when you're with somebody, your first thought is to pray for them and bless them. Imagine that if you're challenged, your first thought is to look to God for strength.
That's what it would be like to have a mind washed by the Word, and that's your goal for the people to whom you speak. That's the goal of biblical preaching. The goal is not to get vast amounts of exegetical information into people.
My goal is not to get people all the way through the Bible. My goal is to get the Bible all the way through people.
Biblical preaching answers three questions: What must hearers know, feel, do? To do that I ask three questions. What do I want people to know? What do I want people to feel? What do I want people to do? I think about these questions for every message I do because if I don't address the mind and heart and will--if I can't answer those questions--then I need not deliver this message because it's not going to wash their minds in the Word.
Your goal is to wash the minds of your people in the Word so that Christ is formed in them. That's biblical preaching.
John Ortberg is teaching pastor at Menlo Park Presbyterian Church in Menlo Park, California.
Monday, May 23, 2005
The Long and the Short of it...
Whew. It's been a long past week. Many a moment I've thought of posting something, but so much else needed to be done. With that said, how about an update on my exciting superheroesque life.
Today I began the process of registering for classes for 05-06 at Bethel Seminary. I discovered that if I really wanted to punish myself, that I could in theory graduate next spring. At this point I don't think that is reasonable though. I would have to take 4 courses each semester, an extra course in September, plus work my job to pay bills, and then get married in December, and learn how to live the married life while all this goes on. I don't think that is the type of foundation I want to lay for my marriage. It's important that I get done with school, so if nothing else I can start paying back my student loans, but I won't do that at the expense of my marriage. My fiancee is chomping at the bit for me to be done with school, but I think when we discuss what I discovered this afternoon she'll agree with my assessment of things.
I'm really feeling the need to move into a paid ministry position. I'm going to have to be a bit more focused on my search. I intend to put a few calls into some of my contacts and see what they might know of or have in their churches. I've been pretty selective in what I would consider, but I might have to lower the bar a bit to get my foot in the door. We'll see what God brings. I am at a place in life where I think I am ready, and the timing couldn't be much better. My obligations at my current church are minimal with our Jr. High ministry having just ended last week. I do have to preach Memorial Day weekend, and have a few other odds and ends duties at church, but nothing really after June 10th. Memorial Day weekend I'm preaching on Genesis 1:1. Good stuff. I'm excited for it.
I had an interesting weekend. Friday Banana (my finacee) planned a date for me, which started with me getting a hair cut at a sports barber. They have TV's everywhere with sports on, foosball tables, video games, and tons of sports memorabilia everywhere. I'm quite pleased with the hair cut, though it cost 30% more than my normal guys at the local barber shop. We then grabbed burritos at Chipotle. The final component of our evening was taking in opening night for the St. Paul Saints of the Northern League. The Saints lost to the Schaumburg Flyers, but it was fun anyhow. The Saints won the Northern League championship last year defeating Schaumburg 3 games to 2, on a walk off home run in the 9th inning with 2 outs and 2 on base. Great drama. The Saints experience is more than just baseball though, they know how to spice things up and have a good time. I caught a tee-shirt (which we gave to one of Banana's students who were at the game), almost caught a foul ball, ate some yummy cheese curds, and got to enjoy a beautiful evening with Banana and her dad. It's a beautiful outdoor stadium, halfway between downtown St. Paul and downtown Minneapolis. We concluded the evening watching the first third of the movie "The Sound of Music" which is Banana's favorite.
Then yesterday Banana and I went to church together, and hung out relaxing until mid-afternoon. We then went over to her house and did some work, after a nice hour long trip to HOME DEPOT!!!! I removed all the wall paper from the upstairs bathroom (it's a pretty good sized bathroom), which took the better part of 4 hours. It was one of the ugliest wall papers I have seen, so it's nice to see it go. Taking wall paper off is a huge mess though. Especially when it covers the top half of the wall, so the glue remove gets to run down your arm all night long, into your arm pit, onto your shirt, across your face etc.
I will try to keep posting more regularly, but until this semester is over I can't make any promises. Praise God in all that you do, for He is worthy.
Today I began the process of registering for classes for 05-06 at Bethel Seminary. I discovered that if I really wanted to punish myself, that I could in theory graduate next spring. At this point I don't think that is reasonable though. I would have to take 4 courses each semester, an extra course in September, plus work my job to pay bills, and then get married in December, and learn how to live the married life while all this goes on. I don't think that is the type of foundation I want to lay for my marriage. It's important that I get done with school, so if nothing else I can start paying back my student loans, but I won't do that at the expense of my marriage. My fiancee is chomping at the bit for me to be done with school, but I think when we discuss what I discovered this afternoon she'll agree with my assessment of things.
I'm really feeling the need to move into a paid ministry position. I'm going to have to be a bit more focused on my search. I intend to put a few calls into some of my contacts and see what they might know of or have in their churches. I've been pretty selective in what I would consider, but I might have to lower the bar a bit to get my foot in the door. We'll see what God brings. I am at a place in life where I think I am ready, and the timing couldn't be much better. My obligations at my current church are minimal with our Jr. High ministry having just ended last week. I do have to preach Memorial Day weekend, and have a few other odds and ends duties at church, but nothing really after June 10th. Memorial Day weekend I'm preaching on Genesis 1:1. Good stuff. I'm excited for it.
I had an interesting weekend. Friday Banana (my finacee) planned a date for me, which started with me getting a hair cut at a sports barber. They have TV's everywhere with sports on, foosball tables, video games, and tons of sports memorabilia everywhere. I'm quite pleased with the hair cut, though it cost 30% more than my normal guys at the local barber shop. We then grabbed burritos at Chipotle. The final component of our evening was taking in opening night for the St. Paul Saints of the Northern League. The Saints lost to the Schaumburg Flyers, but it was fun anyhow. The Saints won the Northern League championship last year defeating Schaumburg 3 games to 2, on a walk off home run in the 9th inning with 2 outs and 2 on base. Great drama. The Saints experience is more than just baseball though, they know how to spice things up and have a good time. I caught a tee-shirt (which we gave to one of Banana's students who were at the game), almost caught a foul ball, ate some yummy cheese curds, and got to enjoy a beautiful evening with Banana and her dad. It's a beautiful outdoor stadium, halfway between downtown St. Paul and downtown Minneapolis. We concluded the evening watching the first third of the movie "The Sound of Music" which is Banana's favorite.
Then yesterday Banana and I went to church together, and hung out relaxing until mid-afternoon. We then went over to her house and did some work, after a nice hour long trip to HOME DEPOT!!!! I removed all the wall paper from the upstairs bathroom (it's a pretty good sized bathroom), which took the better part of 4 hours. It was one of the ugliest wall papers I have seen, so it's nice to see it go. Taking wall paper off is a huge mess though. Especially when it covers the top half of the wall, so the glue remove gets to run down your arm all night long, into your arm pit, onto your shirt, across your face etc.
I will try to keep posting more regularly, but until this semester is over I can't make any promises. Praise God in all that you do, for He is worthy.
Wednesday, May 18, 2005
Understanding Church Systems - Church Leadership
Last week I began a post on a church I had visited in the North Metro area. Yesterday we took another trip, this time to Faith Covenant Church, Burnsville, MN. Faith Covenant is pastored by Dr. David Clark, who was previously a Dean and Professor at Bethel Seminary, and is currently still working as an adjuct professor teach one course per semester. Dr. Clark is one of the best professors I have had, and that is a pretty high compliment. He is incredibly smart, yet is gifted in putting that into terms that the average person can grasp. Dr. Clark has been at Faith for a little over 8 months. In that time, he has given some great direction to the church, and helped them begin on a new course with a clear vision of who they are and where they are going. I'll include my notes from yesterday below. Most are self explanitory. If it doesn't make sense, drop me a comment and I'll try to clarify. A few of the notes are from Dr. John Cionca as well (mostly the end of the notes)
------
David Clark:
- trying to make sure all the things they do have connecting points
so they stick together (Velcro hooks) so there is a cohesive ministry
-need to think through ways people transition from one ministry to
another – junior high students into sr. high programming etc. – no
gaps, no seams, pass the baton onto the next program – avoid overlap
and avoid gaps
5 purposes of the church
-worship – an upward focus
-community – relations and connecting with other people
-service – inside and outside the church
-mission – reaching people for Christ – geographically non-specific
-apprenticeship (discipleship) – information vs. transformation
Community and apprenticeship are inward directed, service and mission
are outward focused
-churches that are growing are tenacious on service and mission
-look at the budget to see where $$ is allocated
Grade each area to see where you are weak
-most churches are (or think they are) A-/B+ in worship, community and
discipleship. Most churches aren't above a C-/D+ on service and
mission in spite of what they think
-Genesis 12:1-3 Abrahamic covenant
-Jewish nation did great at first half (1-2) and poor on the second half (3)
-worship-->community-->service (where people often can come to faith)
-->mission-->apprenticeship-->worship (endless circle)
Invest time, talent, and treasure in vision
Spirit always trumps structure, but you have to have the structure in
place to keep things going day to day.
Plumber analogy – pipes are structure and water is the Spirit. We
want the best flowing pipes possible (remove unecessary kinks), but
without water there is no purpose for the pipes.
-mission happens everywhere
-need to take people to the point of the need to change
-two things lead people to change – a great vision and a burning platform.
-"that's a great idea, how do you see it fitting into our vision…"
-every member is a witness, but not every member is an evangelist
-we can share our story even when we aren't smooth evangelists
-invest and invite – invest in your friends/relationships and then
invite them to hear about Jesus
-requires high quality product @ church for when you invite people
-in our culture excellence is a requirement
-not requiring perfection this week, but improvement
-excellence with intimacy
Create entry points for people other than the worship service
-pre-evangelistic events
-patterned to groom them into the church
-contemporary worship trying to move toward progressive
-drama, dance, art etc.
-Piano led for the most part (guitar othewise)
2 services same style
750-800 in worship +200 children for 1000 on weekend
-don't assess success by attendance
-faith steps for success
-will you give your heart to this vision?
-what are the things that stand in the way of us realizing this vision
-assessing what church needs, then teaching it on the individual level
-EQ – emotionally unhealthy church, but preaching on personal emotional health
-avoiding "you" and using "we"
-Need to have exit interviews for people who leave church
-gives you a good picture of what needs to be looked at
People give to vision, not to paying lights bills.
Average per capita giving is roughly $1100 per attendee (Faith is
over this)
60% of budget for staff is a good rule of thumb (building loans can
skew this for a period)
Pay for staff then program then facilities when possible
Opt for open ended surveys over number/rank order surveys
Focus groups of 15 people max X's number needed to get feedback and to
roll out Vision.
-they did 15 or so of these meetings when DC began making his changes.
------
David Clark:
- trying to make sure all the things they do have connecting points
so they stick together (Velcro hooks) so there is a cohesive ministry
-need to think through ways people transition from one ministry to
another – junior high students into sr. high programming etc. – no
gaps, no seams, pass the baton onto the next program – avoid overlap
and avoid gaps
5 purposes of the church
-worship – an upward focus
-community – relations and connecting with other people
-service – inside and outside the church
-mission – reaching people for Christ – geographically non-specific
-apprenticeship (discipleship) – information vs. transformation
Community and apprenticeship are inward directed, service and mission
are outward focused
-churches that are growing are tenacious on service and mission
-look at the budget to see where $$ is allocated
Grade each area to see where you are weak
-most churches are (or think they are) A-/B+ in worship, community and
discipleship. Most churches aren't above a C-/D+ on service and
mission in spite of what they think
-Genesis 12:1-3 Abrahamic covenant
-Jewish nation did great at first half (1-2) and poor on the second half (3)
-worship-->community-->service (where people often can come to faith)
-->mission-->apprenticeship-->worship (endless circle)
Invest time, talent, and treasure in vision
Spirit always trumps structure, but you have to have the structure in
place to keep things going day to day.
Plumber analogy – pipes are structure and water is the Spirit. We
want the best flowing pipes possible (remove unecessary kinks), but
without water there is no purpose for the pipes.
-mission happens everywhere
-need to take people to the point of the need to change
-two things lead people to change – a great vision and a burning platform.
-"that's a great idea, how do you see it fitting into our vision…"
-every member is a witness, but not every member is an evangelist
-we can share our story even when we aren't smooth evangelists
-invest and invite – invest in your friends/relationships and then
invite them to hear about Jesus
-requires high quality product @ church for when you invite people
-in our culture excellence is a requirement
-not requiring perfection this week, but improvement
-excellence with intimacy
Create entry points for people other than the worship service
-pre-evangelistic events
-patterned to groom them into the church
-contemporary worship trying to move toward progressive
-drama, dance, art etc.
-Piano led for the most part (guitar othewise)
2 services same style
750-800 in worship +200 children for 1000 on weekend
-don't assess success by attendance
-faith steps for success
-will you give your heart to this vision?
-what are the things that stand in the way of us realizing this vision
-assessing what church needs, then teaching it on the individual level
-EQ – emotionally unhealthy church, but preaching on personal emotional health
-avoiding "you" and using "we"
-Need to have exit interviews for people who leave church
-gives you a good picture of what needs to be looked at
People give to vision, not to paying lights bills.
Average per capita giving is roughly $1100 per attendee (Faith is
over this)
60% of budget for staff is a good rule of thumb (building loans can
skew this for a period)
Pay for staff then program then facilities when possible
Opt for open ended surveys over number/rank order surveys
Focus groups of 15 people max X's number needed to get feedback and to
roll out Vision.
-they did 15 or so of these meetings when DC began making his changes.
Sunday, May 15, 2005
It's all about the weekend
From Preaching.com
In a recent edition of his Leadership Uncensored newsletter, Ed Young, Jr., reminded pastors: "At Fellowship, our favorite saying is, 'It's all about the weekend.' Why? Because throughout scripture, the value of corporate worship is hammered home again and again — that's huge. Also, the weekend is the biggest port of entry into your church. That's where most of the guests and visitors show up. So, to make an indelible impression on the most people, you've got to have the weekend hitting on all cylinders.
"Here are some of the ways we've stayed weekend-focused at Fellowship Church:
"1. Put weekend preparation at the top of your day. Personally, I keep the weekend the main thing by making it the first thing of my day. The most difficult thing that I do is thinking about, researching, and praying for the messages — it's very taxing. If I don't jump on that in the morning, I won't have the energy I need to do it justice.
"2. Make the weekend a priority in your spending. If you really want to know what is the most important thing in your church, look at where you're spending the resources. If you are spending more money on stuff that has nothing to do with the weekend, then you're off balance and you're not focused on what's most important. The majority, I think, of funding, resources, and staffing should go towards the weekend.
"3. Give the weekend serious attention during staff meetings. During our weekly Executive Team meetings, what are we spending most of our time talking about? The weekend. We talk about it, we critique last weekend, we compare numbers, and discuss what went well, and what didn't go well. Then we look at the next weekend and target what we can do to make it a better weekend. Of course we talk about other stuff that's happening in the church but we keep our top staff people focused on the weekend." (For more from Ed, visit www.creativepastors.com. And don't miss Ed's article on "Communicating with Creativity" in the May-June issue of Preaching magazine (www.preaching.com).)
------------
While we would all love to say that our church isn't a church where people only come on weekends, the truth be told, most people are only in our churches on weekends. Certainly in smaller churches this is less the norm, but bigger churches definately have a large group that come once a week, only for an hour or two. Ed's model works well for growing churches that are regularly bringing in new people. Churches that have stagnated tend to spend less time/money/effort on the Sunday/weekend services. I do think many churches would be well served to examine their priorities and to give more thought/time/money to their efforts on the weekends, mine included.
In a recent edition of his Leadership Uncensored newsletter, Ed Young, Jr., reminded pastors: "At Fellowship, our favorite saying is, 'It's all about the weekend.' Why? Because throughout scripture, the value of corporate worship is hammered home again and again — that's huge. Also, the weekend is the biggest port of entry into your church. That's where most of the guests and visitors show up. So, to make an indelible impression on the most people, you've got to have the weekend hitting on all cylinders.
"Here are some of the ways we've stayed weekend-focused at Fellowship Church:
"1. Put weekend preparation at the top of your day. Personally, I keep the weekend the main thing by making it the first thing of my day. The most difficult thing that I do is thinking about, researching, and praying for the messages — it's very taxing. If I don't jump on that in the morning, I won't have the energy I need to do it justice.
"2. Make the weekend a priority in your spending. If you really want to know what is the most important thing in your church, look at where you're spending the resources. If you are spending more money on stuff that has nothing to do with the weekend, then you're off balance and you're not focused on what's most important. The majority, I think, of funding, resources, and staffing should go towards the weekend.
"3. Give the weekend serious attention during staff meetings. During our weekly Executive Team meetings, what are we spending most of our time talking about? The weekend. We talk about it, we critique last weekend, we compare numbers, and discuss what went well, and what didn't go well. Then we look at the next weekend and target what we can do to make it a better weekend. Of course we talk about other stuff that's happening in the church but we keep our top staff people focused on the weekend." (For more from Ed, visit www.creativepastors.com. And don't miss Ed's article on "Communicating with Creativity" in the May-June issue of Preaching magazine (www.preaching.com).)
------------
While we would all love to say that our church isn't a church where people only come on weekends, the truth be told, most people are only in our churches on weekends. Certainly in smaller churches this is less the norm, but bigger churches definately have a large group that come once a week, only for an hour or two. Ed's model works well for growing churches that are regularly bringing in new people. Churches that have stagnated tend to spend less time/money/effort on the Sunday/weekend services. I do think many churches would be well served to examine their priorities and to give more thought/time/money to their efforts on the weekends, mine included.
Friday, May 13, 2005
Can we do theology in a vacuum? NO!
Over on Leslie's blog I posted the following comment when she expressed her concern over a previous comment someone made saying "Don't get so caught up in the theology that you miss the point..."
I think an often overlooked key to this is the dining alone principle. Few people enjoy dining alone, especially not on a regular basis. The same goes for theology. It's all good to study theology on your own, to read books and think deep thoughts, but rare is the person who can take it to the next level in this context. We need community, interaction, and most importantly push-back. We need to bouce ideas off of others, learn from them, have them challenge things we say. This stirs the coals of the soul, making both people grow. I think blogs can do this in a limited sense. I don't think we can replace face to face time though. Going to lectures is good, but still not on par with sitting down with a couple of people and forcing your brains to grow. I have had a number of opportunities for this type of dialog, and it's not hard to create these situations if they are not going on around you. Seminary has been fantastic for this. Whether it is grabbing a Prof and having lunch, or standing in the halls during a break in class, many great discussions take place.
It's funny how random things get my mind working. It's especially funny how this frequently happens when I should be using my creative powers on papers that are due (or past due..gulp...).
Back to my point, which would be that we cannot do theology in a vacuum, or if we do it suffers. I think it to be dangerous to practice theology outside of the context of community. Heresy can enter in unchecked. We were created by God to operate in community, in reflection of the community of the Trinity. My periods of personal growth in my faith (and depth of knowledge in theology) have always come at times when I am most deeply committed to others in community. I love the wide open format of blogging, but for me at least I really need that face to face to really push me. I can choose to ignore something posted, or I can just dismiss it and move on. I cannot do this if you are sitting across the table from me (well, I suppose technically I could...). I do think this might be the nugget of wisdom the person who commented on Leslie's blog might actually have been after. We can all sit in ivory towers thinking whatever we like, but when the rubber meets the road is the true test. I'm not talking pragmatism, but living our faith instead of just thinking our faith. We do need to have that background of theology, the time spent in digging through scripture, reading other's thoughts etc. though. Balance of course is the key to this. Either one without the other leads to problems.
I think next time I'll give more thought to this subject before writing so it's more cohesive in it's final product. I suppose that's the danger of blogging whatever is on my mind, and then random rabbit trails that might take me down.
I think an often overlooked key to this is the dining alone principle. Few people enjoy dining alone, especially not on a regular basis. The same goes for theology. It's all good to study theology on your own, to read books and think deep thoughts, but rare is the person who can take it to the next level in this context. We need community, interaction, and most importantly push-back. We need to bouce ideas off of others, learn from them, have them challenge things we say. This stirs the coals of the soul, making both people grow. I think blogs can do this in a limited sense. I don't think we can replace face to face time though. Going to lectures is good, but still not on par with sitting down with a couple of people and forcing your brains to grow. I have had a number of opportunities for this type of dialog, and it's not hard to create these situations if they are not going on around you. Seminary has been fantastic for this. Whether it is grabbing a Prof and having lunch, or standing in the halls during a break in class, many great discussions take place.
It's funny how random things get my mind working. It's especially funny how this frequently happens when I should be using my creative powers on papers that are due (or past due..gulp...).
Back to my point, which would be that we cannot do theology in a vacuum, or if we do it suffers. I think it to be dangerous to practice theology outside of the context of community. Heresy can enter in unchecked. We were created by God to operate in community, in reflection of the community of the Trinity. My periods of personal growth in my faith (and depth of knowledge in theology) have always come at times when I am most deeply committed to others in community. I love the wide open format of blogging, but for me at least I really need that face to face to really push me. I can choose to ignore something posted, or I can just dismiss it and move on. I cannot do this if you are sitting across the table from me (well, I suppose technically I could...). I do think this might be the nugget of wisdom the person who commented on Leslie's blog might actually have been after. We can all sit in ivory towers thinking whatever we like, but when the rubber meets the road is the true test. I'm not talking pragmatism, but living our faith instead of just thinking our faith. We do need to have that background of theology, the time spent in digging through scripture, reading other's thoughts etc. though. Balance of course is the key to this. Either one without the other leads to problems.
I think next time I'll give more thought to this subject before writing so it's more cohesive in it's final product. I suppose that's the danger of blogging whatever is on my mind, and then random rabbit trails that might take me down.
Wednesday, May 11, 2005
Church Governance and Leadership in a Free Church
I spent the afternoon in a Northern Minneapolis suburb (Andover) listening to and interacting with the 3 lead pastors of a quickly growing church (Evangelical Free Church). Got some good stuff, and some interesting rubber meets the road level insight. I also picked up some good process ideas they employ. A beautiful church, with a real vision for the future, and a real vision for meeting their community where they are at. It's really late so I will try to blog with better detail tomorrow some time.
Monday, May 09, 2005
Same-sex unions lose support
Below is an article from today's Star Tribune. The Trib is generally on the liberal side of everything, so it's nice that this even gets mentioned by them. I have blogged on this issue previously. Minnesotans need their day in the polling booth to decide this issue. This also shows the disparity between the metro area politics and the rest of the state. The metro area is enormously more liberal than the rest of the state, and the bulk of the population lives in the metro area, so it does come strongly into play on this issue. Let us vote!
Minnesota Poll: Same-sex unions lose support
http://www.startribune.com/stories/784/5394483.html
A new Star Tribune Minnesota Poll shows that 52 percent of adults in the state oppose gay and lesbian legal unions while 38 percent favor them. The opposition is an increase of 10 percentage points over last year.
Overall, 51 percent of those polled also agree that a constitutional amendment is needed in Minnesota. Forty-six percent agree strongly.
The increase in the opposition to legal unions, which would give same-sex partners many of the same rights as married couples, comes from a 10-percentage-point rise in those who say they are strongly opposed to the idea. The trend, critics say, reflects a nationwide marketing effort by conservatives and religious groups to sway opinions on what has become one of the most divisive issues of the day.
"The way the conversation is being framed is not a good way for our democracy to make decisions. It polarizes the issue to such a degree that the conversation becomes really stilted," said Ann DeGroot, executive director of OutFront Minnesota, which represents the state's gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community. (I disagree with DeGroot here. The conversation is very democratic if we get to vote on it. If only a small minority of the population (GLBT) wag the rest of the dog, that is very un-democratic. She uses this inflammatory rhetoric speak because she is in the weak position. Rather than objectively look at it, she strikes out to paint her opponents as the “bad guys”.)
The increase in opposition to gay and lesbian legal unions is "phenomenal," said Sen. Michele Bachmann, R-Stillwater, who has been a leader in pushing to put the amendment on the state ballot.
She said the increase in strong opposition shows that people are thinking about the personal impact of the issue as states such as California and Massachusetts and countries such as Canada and Belgium wrestle with the status of gay and lesbian couples.
"I think this tells us that people are recognizing that this has an impact on our children, our workplace, our places of worship, our schools," Bachmann said. "This is more than an issue affecting a small percentage of the population. This has the potential for affecting everyone."
One man's view
Poll respondent Rick Schwantes of Willmar is a husband, a father of two children and a "not overly religious" Catholic. He considers himself a Republican but prides himself on not toeing any ideological line. He tells his children that this is a free country and they need to be respectful of other beliefs. Schwantes says all these enter in his decisions on social issues.
But when it comes to same- sex marriage, the 46-year-old Schwantes, a finance manager for Jennie-O Turkey Store, says there is no flexibility. He is adamantly opposed to allowing gay and lesbian couples to enter into any legal unions. He also strongly supports a constitutional amendment against same-sex marriage.
"It's a man-and-woman deal. There is a moral issue there," he said "This country is founded on choice. They've made their choice; that's the lifestyle they want to lead. But don't push it any further than that."
Like Schwantes, 46 percent of poll respondents say they are strongly opposed to the idea of legal unions.
Outstate residents broadly oppose same-sex legal unions (62 percent) as do people identifying themselves as Republican (73 percent). Sixty-two percent of those 65 years old or older oppose it.
Minnesotans between 18 and 24 years old are more likely to support legal unions (57 percent).
Monika Irwin, of Zimmerman, says her opposition to legal unions for gays and lesbians has nothing to do with morality but with economics.
"It's difficult enough for males and females who get married nowadays to gain benefits from an employer. You add lesbian and gay couples, and an employer is going to say, 'Forget it. I'm not going to pay health insurance at all. It's just too much,' " said Irwin, 58, a retired psychologist who describes herself as a political moderate with many gay and lesbian friends.
Positions hardening
Much as the Roe vs. Wade court decision crystallized positions on abortion, there seems to be less middle ground as the same-sex marriage debate continues to mix religious beliefs with politics, said Rep. Nora Slawik, DFL-Maplewood. Slawik has spoken on the House floor about her opposition to gay marriage but her belief that a constitutional amendment is not needed.
"This is a struggle because supporting a constitutional amendment is now defined as a 'Christian' issue even though I might think that saying it's OK to hate somebody is a very un-Christian position to take," she said. "I wish their were a gray button to push."
The results come late in a legislative session as the constitutional amendment debate languishes in the Senate. While the House approved the measure in April, it remains unclear whether the proposal will be heard this year in the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Dean Johnson, DFL-Willmar, has indicated that there is no need for a vote this year because the amendment would not be on the ballot until 2006.
During the most recent House races, billboards and targeted ads focused on previous votes on the gay marriage issue. The issue is likely to play a role in 2006, when seats are up in the House and Senate.
Tom Prichard, president of the Minnesota Family Council, which supports an amendment opposing same-sex marriage, suggested that opposition to same-sex marriage will be an important factor among strong believers going to the polls.
In a statewide survey conducted for the council in February, 49 percent of those questioned said they would be less likely to reelect a state senator if he or she didn't allow a vote on the amendment, while 10 percent said they would be more likely to vote to reelect such a senator.
"The pro-marriage side is definitely becoming stronger as there is more discussion about it," Prichard said.
Minnesota Poll: Same-sex unions lose support
http://www.startribune.com/stories/784/5394483.html
A new Star Tribune Minnesota Poll shows that 52 percent of adults in the state oppose gay and lesbian legal unions while 38 percent favor them. The opposition is an increase of 10 percentage points over last year.
Overall, 51 percent of those polled also agree that a constitutional amendment is needed in Minnesota. Forty-six percent agree strongly.
The increase in the opposition to legal unions, which would give same-sex partners many of the same rights as married couples, comes from a 10-percentage-point rise in those who say they are strongly opposed to the idea. The trend, critics say, reflects a nationwide marketing effort by conservatives and religious groups to sway opinions on what has become one of the most divisive issues of the day.
"The way the conversation is being framed is not a good way for our democracy to make decisions. It polarizes the issue to such a degree that the conversation becomes really stilted," said Ann DeGroot, executive director of OutFront Minnesota, which represents the state's gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community. (I disagree with DeGroot here. The conversation is very democratic if we get to vote on it. If only a small minority of the population (GLBT) wag the rest of the dog, that is very un-democratic. She uses this inflammatory rhetoric speak because she is in the weak position. Rather than objectively look at it, she strikes out to paint her opponents as the “bad guys”.)
The increase in opposition to gay and lesbian legal unions is "phenomenal," said Sen. Michele Bachmann, R-Stillwater, who has been a leader in pushing to put the amendment on the state ballot.
She said the increase in strong opposition shows that people are thinking about the personal impact of the issue as states such as California and Massachusetts and countries such as Canada and Belgium wrestle with the status of gay and lesbian couples.
"I think this tells us that people are recognizing that this has an impact on our children, our workplace, our places of worship, our schools," Bachmann said. "This is more than an issue affecting a small percentage of the population. This has the potential for affecting everyone."
One man's view
Poll respondent Rick Schwantes of Willmar is a husband, a father of two children and a "not overly religious" Catholic. He considers himself a Republican but prides himself on not toeing any ideological line. He tells his children that this is a free country and they need to be respectful of other beliefs. Schwantes says all these enter in his decisions on social issues.
But when it comes to same- sex marriage, the 46-year-old Schwantes, a finance manager for Jennie-O Turkey Store, says there is no flexibility. He is adamantly opposed to allowing gay and lesbian couples to enter into any legal unions. He also strongly supports a constitutional amendment against same-sex marriage.
"It's a man-and-woman deal. There is a moral issue there," he said "This country is founded on choice. They've made their choice; that's the lifestyle they want to lead. But don't push it any further than that."
Like Schwantes, 46 percent of poll respondents say they are strongly opposed to the idea of legal unions.
Outstate residents broadly oppose same-sex legal unions (62 percent) as do people identifying themselves as Republican (73 percent). Sixty-two percent of those 65 years old or older oppose it.
Minnesotans between 18 and 24 years old are more likely to support legal unions (57 percent).
Monika Irwin, of Zimmerman, says her opposition to legal unions for gays and lesbians has nothing to do with morality but with economics.
"It's difficult enough for males and females who get married nowadays to gain benefits from an employer. You add lesbian and gay couples, and an employer is going to say, 'Forget it. I'm not going to pay health insurance at all. It's just too much,' " said Irwin, 58, a retired psychologist who describes herself as a political moderate with many gay and lesbian friends.
Positions hardening
Much as the Roe vs. Wade court decision crystallized positions on abortion, there seems to be less middle ground as the same-sex marriage debate continues to mix religious beliefs with politics, said Rep. Nora Slawik, DFL-Maplewood. Slawik has spoken on the House floor about her opposition to gay marriage but her belief that a constitutional amendment is not needed.
"This is a struggle because supporting a constitutional amendment is now defined as a 'Christian' issue even though I might think that saying it's OK to hate somebody is a very un-Christian position to take," she said. "I wish their were a gray button to push."
The results come late in a legislative session as the constitutional amendment debate languishes in the Senate. While the House approved the measure in April, it remains unclear whether the proposal will be heard this year in the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Dean Johnson, DFL-Willmar, has indicated that there is no need for a vote this year because the amendment would not be on the ballot until 2006.
During the most recent House races, billboards and targeted ads focused on previous votes on the gay marriage issue. The issue is likely to play a role in 2006, when seats are up in the House and Senate.
Tom Prichard, president of the Minnesota Family Council, which supports an amendment opposing same-sex marriage, suggested that opposition to same-sex marriage will be an important factor among strong believers going to the polls.
In a statewide survey conducted for the council in February, 49 percent of those questioned said they would be less likely to reelect a state senator if he or she didn't allow a vote on the amendment, while 10 percent said they would be more likely to vote to reelect such a senator.
"The pro-marriage side is definitely becoming stronger as there is more discussion about it," Prichard said.
Friday, May 06, 2005
In the beginning God created...
Yesterday I spent 5 hours working on a sermon I have to give this coming Monday as well as a sermon for Memorial Day weekend Sunday. Monday I will be preaching from Genesis 1:1, and Memorial Day weekend will be Ephesians 2:1-10. I was pretty burned out on writing by 4:00pm yesterday afternoon, but the great thing is that I was in such an amazing mood from my time spent writing/studying/thinking. Writing sermons is (at least for me) something that I have to work at. I find it both draining and energizing. Draining because of the importance of what I am writing and thinking about. The need for word smithing and phrase crafting can become a point I loose focus. I go in streaks it seems, sometimes things come very naturally, other times it fights me the whole way. Sermon writing is energizing in that I get to dig deep into the Word. I get to imagine how God's will might be served through this message. I get a peek into the work of the Spirit in my life as well as others through this process.
Thursday, May 05, 2005
New Group Blog member
As of today I am a member of a Group Blog called Glorioius Gospel of Christ Group. I made my very first post today. My personal blog will be my priority, but I hope to contribute to the group blog with regularity as well. The next four weeks I might not be posting as much as the past two weeks though. The crush of the end of semester obligations call for my attention.
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
Light for the lost...
The follow was inspired by RC Sproul.
Your word is a lamp to my feet
And a light to my path (Psalm 119:105).
God’s Word (the Bible) keeps us from crashing off the path God has intended, which always results in us flat on our faces. It is of critical importance as to whether we find our being on our faces as a time to reflect on what got us there. If you have ever tried to walk in unfamiliar territory in the dark, you know how dangerous (and potentially shin bruising) that can be.
Having a working flashlight keeps us safely on the path. God’s Word is exactly that – intended to keep us on the path He intended for us. Without our flashlight we are sure to get lost and in trouble.
But unlike a flashlight, God’s Word gets more powerful with use. It is up to us to decide how bright we want our light to shine, and the source of our light is God. Do we want to be a small ember of faith, barely enough to singe the fingers of the world, or do we want to be an enormous blaze, that the world cannot help but see? Each of us who have saving faith start as an ember, and it is up to us to tend that ember and make it glow.
Are you using your flashlight? Can others see your glow?
Your word is a lamp to my feet
And a light to my path (Psalm 119:105).
God’s Word (the Bible) keeps us from crashing off the path God has intended, which always results in us flat on our faces. It is of critical importance as to whether we find our being on our faces as a time to reflect on what got us there. If you have ever tried to walk in unfamiliar territory in the dark, you know how dangerous (and potentially shin bruising) that can be.
Having a working flashlight keeps us safely on the path. God’s Word is exactly that – intended to keep us on the path He intended for us. Without our flashlight we are sure to get lost and in trouble.
But unlike a flashlight, God’s Word gets more powerful with use. It is up to us to decide how bright we want our light to shine, and the source of our light is God. Do we want to be a small ember of faith, barely enough to singe the fingers of the world, or do we want to be an enormous blaze, that the world cannot help but see? Each of us who have saving faith start as an ember, and it is up to us to tend that ember and make it glow.
Are you using your flashlight? Can others see your glow?
Quote - Pray
"Do not pray for easy lives; pray to be stronger men. Do not pray for tasks equal to your powers; pray for powers equal to your tasks. Then the doing of your work shall be no miracle, but you yourself shall be a miracle. Every day you shall wonder at yourself, at the richness of life which has come to you by the grace of God." (Phillips Brooks)
Leadership Article - Developing a Vision
I am working with the senior pastor of my church on a number of leadership fronts, one key one being developing a Vision for the church and within that a new mission statement that covers our values and vision. I found the below article on the Christianity Today website earlier today. I thought that those of you with an interest of leadership might enjoy the article.
--------------------
Developing a Vision
What kind of church would we like to be?
By Aubrey Malphurs
Vision is essential to a church. However, unlike the values, mission, and purpose, the vision is more subject to change. It is dynamic, not static. Over time, the vision must be renewed, adapted, and adjusted to the cultural context in which the congregation lives. The change takes place only at the margins of the vision, not at its core. The core—the Great Commission—does not change. The details of the vision and the words used to convey them will change. The vision provides us with a picture of what the mission will look like as it is realized in the community.
The vision concept is not new to the Scriptures. You will find visions sprinkled throughout the Old and New Testaments. For example, God caught Abraham's attention with his vision for him in Genesis 12:1–3 (the Abrahamic covenant). God used Moses to communicate his vision for his people, Israel, in Exodus 3:7–8 and Deuteronomy 8:7–10. It is possible that the "joy" that Jesus looked forward to while enduring the cross was the vision of his return to the presence of his Father in heaven (Heb. 12:2).
The Importance of a Vision
The limited information that is available indicates that pastors and congregations are struggling with the vision concept. For example, in commenting on pastors and their visions, George Barna writes, "But when we asked these pastors, 'Can you articulate God's vision for the ministry of your church?' we found that roughly 90 percent of them could articulate a basic definition of ministry. But only 2 percent could articulate the vision for their church." David Goetz writes, "In Leadership's study, however, pastors indicated that conflicting visions for the church was their greatest source of tension and the top reason they were terminated or forced to resign." Clearly, vision is of utmost importance to leaders and their ministry. Here are seven reasons why.
A Vision Encourages Unity
In a ministry a shared vision changes people's relationship to one another. When a leader casts a vision in a church, it is no longer "their church," it becomes "our church." The ministry's vision encourages and allows people to come together and work together. It creates a common identity in two ways. First, it signals to all where the ministry is going. It says that if you want to go where we are going, then climb on board—let us go together. Second, it fosters the retention of congregants and staff. A common vision says that we are working together toward the same goals. We need each other if anything significant is going to happen for Christ. This, in effect, mirrors such passages as 1 Corinthians 12:20–22 and Ephesians 4:15–16.
A Vision Creates Energy
Not much happens without an inspiring, compelling vision. Not much was happening in Nehemiah's day. The people had no vision. Jerusalem lay in ruins, and no one was motivated to do anything about it (Neh.1: 3). Then along came Nehemiah with a vision from God to rebuild the gates and walls of the city. Visions are exciting and they energize people. They strike a spark—the excitement that lifts a ministry organization out of the mundane. They supply the fuel that lights the fire under a congregation—leaders are able to stop putting out fires and start igniting a few. A vision from God has the potential to turn a maintenance mentality into a ministry mentality. And when your vision resonates with your values and mission, it generates the energy that fuels the accomplishment of the ministry task.
A Vision Provides Purpose
The right vision creates meaning in people's lives. It gives them a sense of divine purpose in life. They are a part of something great that God is accomplishing at this time and place in history. With a shared vision, people see themselves not just as another congregant or a "pew warmer," but as a vital part of a church that is having a powerful impact on a lost and dying world. They are not simply in a church; they are on a mission. They are part of a revolution that has the potential to change this world, to have a wonderful impact for Christ. For example, a wide gap exists in terms of commitment and dedication to God and a sense of personal significance between one member who, when asked what he or she does, replies, "I am a teacher" and another, who may have the same ministry, but answers, "I am changing the life course of a class of adolescents who will someday accomplish great things for Christ."
A Vision Fosters Risk Taking
A shared vision fosters risk-taking by a congregation. This is especially true in church-planting situations. When the point person or lead pastor casts the vision, everyone knows what needs to be done. That is not the question. The question is, How will we do it? Sometimes we know the answer, but most often we do not. Consequently, ministry for Christ becomes an exciting adventure into the world of the unknown. We attempt something for Christ and it does not work. We attempt something else and it does work. Though much of what we are doing is experimental, it is not ambiguous. It is perfectly clear to all why we are doing it. It is for God and the Savior. People are not asking for guarantees. They all know that no guarantees exist, yet people are committed anyway. The risks are great, but so is the God they serve, and the vision he has given them. How else can we explain the early church and what God accomplished through them or those believers that make up the faith hall of fame in Hebrews 11?
A Vision Enhances Leadership
Developing a vision and then living it vigorously are essential elements of leadership. I define a leader as a godly servant who knows where he or she is going and has followers. That describes not only the Savior, but his disciples and those who ministered in the early church as recorded in Acts. Godly servants are people who display Christ-like character throughout the ministry organization. They exhibit the fruit of the Spirit, given in Galatians 5:22–23. They know where they are going and where they are leading their ministry. They have a dynamic mission and, most important, a clear, energizing vision that paints a picture of the future. The consequence of character and vision is followers. When a congregation has a leader who owns a vision and lives that vision in a Christ-like manner, they will follow that leader to the ends of the earth.
A Vision Promotes Excellence
God desires that his church minister and serve well on his behalf. This calls for ministry excellence. Whatever we do for Christ must be done well, not sloppily or haphazardly. In the Old Testament God required that people give their best when they brought animals for sacrifice (Lev. 22:20–22). This was excellence in worship. In the New Testament Paul explains that God expects us to put forth our best efforts in our work. He says to perform as if we are working for him (Eph. 6:5–8; Col. 3:23–24). This is excellence in the marketplace.
A shared organizational vision promotes a standard of excellence. Deep down, people want to do a good job, to have a sense that they are effectively and powerfully advancing God's program through their ministry in the church. The vision casts a picture of what that looks like. It provides a visual, mental measure by which staff and congregation can evaluate how well they and the ministry are doing.
A Vision Sustains Ministry
Ministry can be very difficult, even painful. Discouragement and disappointment often lurk in the ministry hallways and boardrooms of the typical church. It is not beyond the enemy to incite persecution against Christ's church (Acts 8:1). Spiritual warfare comes with the ministry territory (Eph. 6:10–18). Many have risked or given their lives for the Savior and the furtherance of the gospel. The list of martyrs for the cause of Christ is extensive. Why? What has sustained Christians from the beginning of the church in the Book of Acts up to today? One answer is a biblical, compelling vision. It encourages people to look beyond the mundane and the pain of ministry. It keeps a picture in front of them that distracts from what is and announces what could be. All the trouble and grief that we experience in this world while serving the Savior are trivial compared to the importance of what we are attempting for him. That picture, carried in our mental billfolds, is one way God sustains us in the worst of times.
--------------------
Developing a Vision
What kind of church would we like to be?
By Aubrey Malphurs
Vision is essential to a church. However, unlike the values, mission, and purpose, the vision is more subject to change. It is dynamic, not static. Over time, the vision must be renewed, adapted, and adjusted to the cultural context in which the congregation lives. The change takes place only at the margins of the vision, not at its core. The core—the Great Commission—does not change. The details of the vision and the words used to convey them will change. The vision provides us with a picture of what the mission will look like as it is realized in the community.
The vision concept is not new to the Scriptures. You will find visions sprinkled throughout the Old and New Testaments. For example, God caught Abraham's attention with his vision for him in Genesis 12:1–3 (the Abrahamic covenant). God used Moses to communicate his vision for his people, Israel, in Exodus 3:7–8 and Deuteronomy 8:7–10. It is possible that the "joy" that Jesus looked forward to while enduring the cross was the vision of his return to the presence of his Father in heaven (Heb. 12:2).
The Importance of a Vision
The limited information that is available indicates that pastors and congregations are struggling with the vision concept. For example, in commenting on pastors and their visions, George Barna writes, "But when we asked these pastors, 'Can you articulate God's vision for the ministry of your church?' we found that roughly 90 percent of them could articulate a basic definition of ministry. But only 2 percent could articulate the vision for their church." David Goetz writes, "In Leadership's study, however, pastors indicated that conflicting visions for the church was their greatest source of tension and the top reason they were terminated or forced to resign." Clearly, vision is of utmost importance to leaders and their ministry. Here are seven reasons why.
A Vision Encourages Unity
In a ministry a shared vision changes people's relationship to one another. When a leader casts a vision in a church, it is no longer "their church," it becomes "our church." The ministry's vision encourages and allows people to come together and work together. It creates a common identity in two ways. First, it signals to all where the ministry is going. It says that if you want to go where we are going, then climb on board—let us go together. Second, it fosters the retention of congregants and staff. A common vision says that we are working together toward the same goals. We need each other if anything significant is going to happen for Christ. This, in effect, mirrors such passages as 1 Corinthians 12:20–22 and Ephesians 4:15–16.
A Vision Creates Energy
Not much happens without an inspiring, compelling vision. Not much was happening in Nehemiah's day. The people had no vision. Jerusalem lay in ruins, and no one was motivated to do anything about it (Neh.1: 3). Then along came Nehemiah with a vision from God to rebuild the gates and walls of the city. Visions are exciting and they energize people. They strike a spark—the excitement that lifts a ministry organization out of the mundane. They supply the fuel that lights the fire under a congregation—leaders are able to stop putting out fires and start igniting a few. A vision from God has the potential to turn a maintenance mentality into a ministry mentality. And when your vision resonates with your values and mission, it generates the energy that fuels the accomplishment of the ministry task.
A Vision Provides Purpose
The right vision creates meaning in people's lives. It gives them a sense of divine purpose in life. They are a part of something great that God is accomplishing at this time and place in history. With a shared vision, people see themselves not just as another congregant or a "pew warmer," but as a vital part of a church that is having a powerful impact on a lost and dying world. They are not simply in a church; they are on a mission. They are part of a revolution that has the potential to change this world, to have a wonderful impact for Christ. For example, a wide gap exists in terms of commitment and dedication to God and a sense of personal significance between one member who, when asked what he or she does, replies, "I am a teacher" and another, who may have the same ministry, but answers, "I am changing the life course of a class of adolescents who will someday accomplish great things for Christ."
A Vision Fosters Risk Taking
A shared vision fosters risk-taking by a congregation. This is especially true in church-planting situations. When the point person or lead pastor casts the vision, everyone knows what needs to be done. That is not the question. The question is, How will we do it? Sometimes we know the answer, but most often we do not. Consequently, ministry for Christ becomes an exciting adventure into the world of the unknown. We attempt something for Christ and it does not work. We attempt something else and it does work. Though much of what we are doing is experimental, it is not ambiguous. It is perfectly clear to all why we are doing it. It is for God and the Savior. People are not asking for guarantees. They all know that no guarantees exist, yet people are committed anyway. The risks are great, but so is the God they serve, and the vision he has given them. How else can we explain the early church and what God accomplished through them or those believers that make up the faith hall of fame in Hebrews 11?
A Vision Enhances Leadership
Developing a vision and then living it vigorously are essential elements of leadership. I define a leader as a godly servant who knows where he or she is going and has followers. That describes not only the Savior, but his disciples and those who ministered in the early church as recorded in Acts. Godly servants are people who display Christ-like character throughout the ministry organization. They exhibit the fruit of the Spirit, given in Galatians 5:22–23. They know where they are going and where they are leading their ministry. They have a dynamic mission and, most important, a clear, energizing vision that paints a picture of the future. The consequence of character and vision is followers. When a congregation has a leader who owns a vision and lives that vision in a Christ-like manner, they will follow that leader to the ends of the earth.
A Vision Promotes Excellence
God desires that his church minister and serve well on his behalf. This calls for ministry excellence. Whatever we do for Christ must be done well, not sloppily or haphazardly. In the Old Testament God required that people give their best when they brought animals for sacrifice (Lev. 22:20–22). This was excellence in worship. In the New Testament Paul explains that God expects us to put forth our best efforts in our work. He says to perform as if we are working for him (Eph. 6:5–8; Col. 3:23–24). This is excellence in the marketplace.
A shared organizational vision promotes a standard of excellence. Deep down, people want to do a good job, to have a sense that they are effectively and powerfully advancing God's program through their ministry in the church. The vision casts a picture of what that looks like. It provides a visual, mental measure by which staff and congregation can evaluate how well they and the ministry are doing.
A Vision Sustains Ministry
Ministry can be very difficult, even painful. Discouragement and disappointment often lurk in the ministry hallways and boardrooms of the typical church. It is not beyond the enemy to incite persecution against Christ's church (Acts 8:1). Spiritual warfare comes with the ministry territory (Eph. 6:10–18). Many have risked or given their lives for the Savior and the furtherance of the gospel. The list of martyrs for the cause of Christ is extensive. Why? What has sustained Christians from the beginning of the church in the Book of Acts up to today? One answer is a biblical, compelling vision. It encourages people to look beyond the mundane and the pain of ministry. It keeps a picture in front of them that distracts from what is and announces what could be. All the trouble and grief that we experience in this world while serving the Savior are trivial compared to the importance of what we are attempting for him. That picture, carried in our mental billfolds, is one way God sustains us in the worst of times.
Tuesday, May 03, 2005
CBMW DVD and CJ Mahaney
Today I recieved in the mail a gift to myself. Back a few months ago, I purchased a DVD of the conference I attended hosted by the Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood where Wayne Grudem and CJ Mahaney spoke. I had forgotten I purchased the DVD, as it had been a few months. I love getting things in the mail. Especially things like this. Ok, so I hate getting bills in the mail, but everything else I like getting.
The DVD is a recording of both presentations. Outstanding, and inspiring. As I find to watch it and pour over it, I'll dump little tid bits and thoughts into this blog. The first one is below.
-------------
After expositing a bit on 1 Timothy 2:8-15, CJ Mahaney states (my paraphrase): We as pastors don't have the option of ignoring this issue(the issue of Biblical views of manhood and womanhood). That's not an option. We don't have the option of avoiding this issue to avoid offending the culture, or in hopes of expanding evangelism. To the extent that the church understands and applies Biblical manhood and womanhood, I believe the church will be strengthened in her role as a pillar and support of the truth of the Gospel. And to the extent that we ignore this teaching, the church's Gospel proclaiming and Gospel protecting function will be weakened, and potentially or eventually, the Gospel itself will be placed in peril. Therefore it is our role and responsiblity as pastors to claify, cultivate, and celebrate biblical masculinity and femininity.
---------------
I believe this issue is a key issue facing the church today. It goes to a root level of worldview and hermeneutics. The message given by Mahaney was quite counter cultural. At least in the USA, the past 40 years of culture has been driven by a humanist view of sexuality. I'm not willing to throw the baby out with the bath water and say all the result of this is negative, but much of what has occurred because of this "sexual revolution" has been a negative on society in my opinion. Abortion, no fault divorce, radical feminism, acceptance of pornography, the homosexual agenda, single mothers, and the confusion between gender roles all are greatly influenced by this humanist view of sexuality that pervades our culture. And many churches are unwilling to stand against it, especially mainstream protestant churches in the USA. For too many years the tail has been wagging the dog, the church has been pushed around by the culture. I think we as pastors, and church members need to insist that we as the church need to be the transforming agent for our culture, and not the other way around. There is some room for discussion on our methodology (See DLW's blog The Anti-Manicheist for a take different than mine on methodology), but no room for the church to be soft on the issue/need for us to be cultural change agents. I believe our views on manhood and womanhood to be secondary issues of primary importance for the modern church.
The DVD is a recording of both presentations. Outstanding, and inspiring. As I find to watch it and pour over it, I'll dump little tid bits and thoughts into this blog. The first one is below.
-------------
After expositing a bit on 1 Timothy 2:8-15, CJ Mahaney states (my paraphrase): We as pastors don't have the option of ignoring this issue(the issue of Biblical views of manhood and womanhood). That's not an option. We don't have the option of avoiding this issue to avoid offending the culture, or in hopes of expanding evangelism. To the extent that the church understands and applies Biblical manhood and womanhood, I believe the church will be strengthened in her role as a pillar and support of the truth of the Gospel. And to the extent that we ignore this teaching, the church's Gospel proclaiming and Gospel protecting function will be weakened, and potentially or eventually, the Gospel itself will be placed in peril. Therefore it is our role and responsiblity as pastors to claify, cultivate, and celebrate biblical masculinity and femininity.
---------------
I believe this issue is a key issue facing the church today. It goes to a root level of worldview and hermeneutics. The message given by Mahaney was quite counter cultural. At least in the USA, the past 40 years of culture has been driven by a humanist view of sexuality. I'm not willing to throw the baby out with the bath water and say all the result of this is negative, but much of what has occurred because of this "sexual revolution" has been a negative on society in my opinion. Abortion, no fault divorce, radical feminism, acceptance of pornography, the homosexual agenda, single mothers, and the confusion between gender roles all are greatly influenced by this humanist view of sexuality that pervades our culture. And many churches are unwilling to stand against it, especially mainstream protestant churches in the USA. For too many years the tail has been wagging the dog, the church has been pushed around by the culture. I think we as pastors, and church members need to insist that we as the church need to be the transforming agent for our culture, and not the other way around. There is some room for discussion on our methodology (See DLW's blog The Anti-Manicheist for a take different than mine on methodology), but no room for the church to be soft on the issue/need for us to be cultural change agents. I believe our views on manhood and womanhood to be secondary issues of primary importance for the modern church.
Readability...
Joe Carter, at Evangelical Outpost, blogged about the readability of his blog. It got me thinking, and I decided to see how mine measures up.
http://www.juicystudio.com/fog/index.asp
Readability Results for http://mrclm.blogspot.com
Readability ResultsSummary Value
Total sentences 521
Total words 7,100
Average words per Sentence 13.63
Words with 1 Syllable 4,842
Words with 2 Syllables 1,289
Words with 3 Syllables 639
Words with 4 or more Syllables 330
Percentage of word with three or more syllables 13.65%
Average Syllables per Word 1.50
Gunning Fog Index 10.91
Flesch Reading Ease 66.02
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 7.44
So according to this, my blog reads a bit harder than his does. I suspect that is because I have a number of articles posted in my blog, articles written by smart people who use big words.
Typical Fog Index Scores
Fog Index Resources
6 TV guides, The Bible, Mark Twain
8 Reader's Digest
8 - 10 Most popular novels
10 Time, Newsweek
11 Wall Street Journal
14 The Times, The Guardian
15 - 20 Academic papers
Over 20 Only government sites can get away with this, because you can't ignore them.
Over 30 The government is covering something up
So right now I rank as more difficult to read than Newsweek and Time. I wouldn't consider either of those difficult to read, though the WSJ can give headaches because of the subject matter more than the writing.
I was curious about how this plays out on other things, so I randomly chose 3 sermons by John Piper from desiringgod.org and was surprized to find out that the highest score was just below 8, and the lowest score just above 6. I had expected to find his writing (even in his sermons) to be pretty high reading level stuff. Perhaps I'm confusing his ability to make me think about difficult things with his use of words. I suppose I am inclined to think something is more complex if it requires more thought/discomfort/difficulty on my part.
I am in the middle of a study break from school. We get two weeks in the middle of each semester where we scramble to catch up on all we are behind on, and work ahead if possible. Over the next 6 days I really need to work out one full sermon (Genesis 9), the better part of a second sermon (Genesis3?), refine and think about a third sermon to be preached the end of the month from Ephesians 2:1-10. I also need to review and study Greek, and read a book on reserve at the library. Add to that working 5 days at the Lobster, church meetings this morning and Tuesday morning, J-hi youth group Wednesday night, and a date with my beloved Banana on Friday, and I don't feel as if I'm getting much "break" from the study break. There is light at the end of the tunnel though, as the semester is half over as of today. I'm sure someday I'm going to miss being in school...
In spite of the above, I do feel enormously blessed by God, and feel that this is where He wants me for this season of life. It's funny how we can be where we believe God wants us, but nonetheless still be anxiously looking forward to the next stage. I suppose there is a lesson in there for me to learn to live in the moment, but I'm just too impatient :-) The old "hurry up God and bless me with patience" trap. Life is good. Praise God. Praise God, even when life isn't good.
I also need to quit blogging so late at night. I think my thinking skills decrease this time of night, but my creativity increases. Sometimes that is good, sometimes that is not so good.
http://www.juicystudio.com/fog/index.asp
Readability Results for http://mrclm.blogspot.com
Readability ResultsSummary Value
Total sentences 521
Total words 7,100
Average words per Sentence 13.63
Words with 1 Syllable 4,842
Words with 2 Syllables 1,289
Words with 3 Syllables 639
Words with 4 or more Syllables 330
Percentage of word with three or more syllables 13.65%
Average Syllables per Word 1.50
Gunning Fog Index 10.91
Flesch Reading Ease 66.02
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 7.44
So according to this, my blog reads a bit harder than his does. I suspect that is because I have a number of articles posted in my blog, articles written by smart people who use big words.
Typical Fog Index Scores
Fog Index Resources
6 TV guides, The Bible, Mark Twain
8 Reader's Digest
8 - 10 Most popular novels
10 Time, Newsweek
11 Wall Street Journal
14 The Times, The Guardian
15 - 20 Academic papers
Over 20 Only government sites can get away with this, because you can't ignore them.
Over 30 The government is covering something up
So right now I rank as more difficult to read than Newsweek and Time. I wouldn't consider either of those difficult to read, though the WSJ can give headaches because of the subject matter more than the writing.
I was curious about how this plays out on other things, so I randomly chose 3 sermons by John Piper from desiringgod.org and was surprized to find out that the highest score was just below 8, and the lowest score just above 6. I had expected to find his writing (even in his sermons) to be pretty high reading level stuff. Perhaps I'm confusing his ability to make me think about difficult things with his use of words. I suppose I am inclined to think something is more complex if it requires more thought/discomfort/difficulty on my part.
I am in the middle of a study break from school. We get two weeks in the middle of each semester where we scramble to catch up on all we are behind on, and work ahead if possible. Over the next 6 days I really need to work out one full sermon (Genesis 9), the better part of a second sermon (Genesis3?), refine and think about a third sermon to be preached the end of the month from Ephesians 2:1-10. I also need to review and study Greek, and read a book on reserve at the library. Add to that working 5 days at the Lobster, church meetings this morning and Tuesday morning, J-hi youth group Wednesday night, and a date with my beloved Banana on Friday, and I don't feel as if I'm getting much "break" from the study break. There is light at the end of the tunnel though, as the semester is half over as of today. I'm sure someday I'm going to miss being in school...
In spite of the above, I do feel enormously blessed by God, and feel that this is where He wants me for this season of life. It's funny how we can be where we believe God wants us, but nonetheless still be anxiously looking forward to the next stage. I suppose there is a lesson in there for me to learn to live in the moment, but I'm just too impatient :-) The old "hurry up God and bless me with patience" trap. Life is good. Praise God. Praise God, even when life isn't good.
I also need to quit blogging so late at night. I think my thinking skills decrease this time of night, but my creativity increases. Sometimes that is good, sometimes that is not so good.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)