tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8657772.post5197515191580439242..comments2009-10-21T12:32:47.824-05:00mrclmhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05717903860701408008noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8657772.post-36080631458191185702009-10-21T12:32:47.824-05:002009-10-21T12:32:47.824-05:00BTW, if you&#39;d like to interact with the author Douglas Wilson you can find him at - <a href="http://www.dougwils.com/" rel="nofollow">Blog and Mablog</a>mrclmhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05717903860701408008noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8657772.post-47244580198633591782009-10-21T12:30:15.033-05:002009-10-21T12:30:15.033-05:00I think you missed, intentionally or otherwise, the whole intent of the article. The article is about being intellectually genuine and honest, not about physics. Did you want to address this on what it is about rather than the red herring you put forth? If you want to interact with the author, I&#39;m sure he&#39;d love your feedback - he&#39;s been regularly interacting with Christopher Hitchens on these subject for quite some time. But to expect an extensive defense of physics in an article not about that is quite ridiculous. Additionally, with the limitations of space provided by the Washington Post, I don&#39;t think it should come as a surprise that his reductionist example falls short when extended out beyond the point the author was making. Neither he nor I made claims that this was about physics, it&#39;s about intellectual integrity (or the absence of) within the greater atheistic community in America.mrclmhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05717903860701408008noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8657772.post-56386467520381484532009-10-21T02:43:07.542-05:002009-10-21T02:43:07.542-05:00LOL! Thanks for that; a clear demonstration that our dear pastor knows nothing of physics OR philosophy. If that is the level of argument we have to deal with, I won&#39;t be losing any sleep...Jorgon Gorgonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17961096650184788709noreply@blogger.com